She was the perfect woman in the 1940s
Answer:
The limitations of having Nick as a narrator is that the readers are not able to know the thoughts of other characters. In First-person narrative, readers get to know only what narrator knows and what he sees and perceives about the event.
The evidence of this limitation in chapter is apparent when Nick gets drunk and he himself claims that his drunkness <em>has a dim hazy cast over it.</em>
Explanation:
The Great Gatsby is a novel written by F. Scott Fitzgerald. The novel is about Jay Gatsby and is narrated by Nick Carraway.
The story is narrated from First-person point of view. The limitation of having Nick as a narrator is that readers are not able to perceive the thoughts of other characters, especially that of Jay Gatsby. The readers get to know only what limited view of Nick narrated to them. They are able to see only what Nick sees and nothing beyond it or other's viewpoint. It is the viewpoint of Nick that moulds the story of Gatsby.
This limitation is apparent in Chapter 2 of the novel when Nick gets drunk at the party and himself admits that his drunkness <em>has a dim hazy cast over it. </em>This suggests that Nick was not able to trust his own narration of this particular event after he got intoxicated.
I do not think that Shakespeare sees evil as stronger than good or human
understanding because in the end, Scotland is returned to her rightful
king and Malcolm is an element of good in the play. Macbeth certainly
is taken over by his greed and ambition, and a sense of evil gets the
better of him and clouds his good judgment. However, evil overall does
not reign supreme, and the audience sees the harm that evil has caused
to Macbeth throughout the play. He has lost his wife, the loyalty of
his subjects, and his integrity. Macbeth knows that he should grow old
in the company of friends, but he acknowledges that he is now alone. So
evil does not overcome good in the end--evil leaves Scotland with the
beheading of Macbeth.
- hope this helps
Answer:
Paine's main purpose is to encourage the soldiers and people at home to not give up, and to keep fighting for their freedom. One of the most powerful details supporting this is that, if they don't win this war, then they are going to become slaves to Britain.
Explanation:
I read the book about Thomas Paine
Hi. You have not submitted the counterclain this question refers to. Which makes it impossible for this question to be answered. However, I will try to help you as best I can.
It is only possible to answer this question if you read all the text it refers to and understand the topic of the debate in which King is participating. Next you should read the counterclaim the question is referring to and identify how King might disagree with that.
A containclaim is presented to contest a previously presented argument and a rebuttal is presented to show disagreement with the counterclaim. In this case, King presented an argument, which was challenged by the counterclaim, and then king refuted the counterclaim by showing how incorrect it is.
