1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andriy [413]
3 years ago
15

Why did the french revolution happen and who's fault was it

History
1 answer:
masha68 [24]3 years ago
8 0
Well, the French people were angry with the King and Queen of France because they were filthy rich and ignored the poor. The people of France beheaded the French King and Queen. Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
There are no written records of the first migration of humans to the americas?true or false
Leona [35]

yes there are written records of the first migration of humans to the americas

so thats true

7 0
3 years ago
What 3 European ships used the lateen sail?
ddd [48]

Answer:

Germany,china,japan

4 0
3 years ago
who produced large quantities of steel very efficiently by buying and controlling iron ore deposits, steel mils, and railroads?
PSYCHO15rus [73]
The Africans would be the answer
4 0
3 years ago
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION
Amanda [17]
True , because it stated that slavery was often referred and is recognized as the immediate cause of the civil war.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did different religious groups gain protection under Muslim rulers?
Rzqust [24]

Answer:

To begin, we need to first grasp the basic terminology relevant to the study of religious minorities. Religious minorities are known as dhimmīs, short for ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, a term that later became synonymous with the People of the Book.[4] The original meaning of al-dhimmah, however, meant protection, and it was often short for dhimmat–Allah wa-rasūlih, or the “protection of God and His Prophet.”[5] In short, the concept originally had a divine connotation, or a meaning that was directly related to the power of God. However, the concept soon morphed into a technical legal term with the progression of classical scholarship, and it consequently lost its transcendent dimension.[6] As a result, ahl al-dhimmah, or people of the dhimmah, has become a legal term and not a reference to the recipients of divine protection. It is important to discuss the etymology of the word because it demonstrates the significance of the people of the dhimmah who, at the very root of it all, are people who were to be protected on behalf of God and His Prophet ﷺ – an immense responsibility. This status is awarded to People of the Book (who according to many scholars includes Zoroastrians and others) who agree through contract to pay the jizyah, or poll-tax, in exchange for that protection.[7] In sum, the formation of the people of the dhimmah was rooted in religious minorities paying a tax that exempted them from military service. Much more nuance can be embedded within all of these terms that are sometimes highly contested among scholars, but considering the limited scope of this paper, we will move forward to address the larger picture at hand.

The power of the Muslim state was dependent on its ability to provide two precious resources to its people: security and justice.[8] Christians and Jews and other minorities were not technically citizens of the Muslim state; they were considered outsiders under the protection of the state, leading to the title of dhimmah, or protected people.[9] Their protection was guaranteed in a number of ways: by providing them with legal autonomy – meaning they could maintain their religious practices without interference – and protection during war. That said, there have no doubt been incidents throughout history in which that protection was threatened or revoked and the Muslim ruler engaged in persecution of religious minorities.[10] The fact remains, however, that there was never widespread systematic persecution of Christians, for example, in the Islamic world as there was in the late Roman Empire.[11] And the hostile circumstances that did occasionally arise, were not due to Islamic legislation per se, but were rather a result of an amalgam of social, political, and economic circumstances. So while Christians historically at times suffered at the hands of Muslims, it was almost never a result of their being Christian, or their beliefs, but a result of various factors related to the pursuit of power.[12]

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Two questions.
    8·2 answers
  • What were living conditions with the ancient greece?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of following is true about the economy of oklahoma during world war 1
    8·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between citizens of the United States and "global citizens"?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which description matches the Native American culture given ?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following ideas was the
    9·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Potsdam Conference and the decisions made there?
    15·2 answers
  • The Nile river contains dangerous fast moving waters called
    15·2 answers
  • Question 5 of 15
    10·1 answer
  • Where in Florida did Ponce De Leon first land?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!