Taking into account the statement above: "Explain in your own words how the thesis of causal determinism would seem at odds with the possibility of a person's doing something of his or her own free will. (This will involve explaining what causal determinism is (how it differs from fatalism) and what free will involves, and why the truth of the one would seem to conflict with the possibility of the other.)"
the causes of the event are sufficient to occur in which no other event would occur.
For example: light a match
For the fatalism, the action is to predetermine with no causal antecedents for the action to occur.
Free will involves the condition that you would do otherwise if you had chosen.
And the issue of where they conflict is that you cannot both be determined and free.
For example: the Bridge Breaking.
Hope this helps.
The answer to this question is <span>They were able to identify with one another, and worked together to obtain the freedom they wanted.
At that time, both slaves and servants were placed at the bottom of social pole, where they basically receive inhumane treatments from others. Due to their effort in activism they decided to go out and obtain their own freedom rather than sitting around waiting for others to give it to them</span>
200,000 people live there. It has a population of over 8 million!
In 1810, Father Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla calls for Mexican independence from Spain, spurring a series of revolts across the country that becomes known as the Hidalgo rebellion. The rebellion fails, but fighting continues. Meanwhile, the United States and Spain are locked in debate over the border between their territories. In 1819, the Adams-Onis Treaty, also known as the Transcontinental Treaty, draws a definitive border between Spanish land and the Louisiana Territory. The United States cedes California, New Mexico, Texas, and modern Arizona, Nevada, and Utah to Spain; it also agrees to pay U.S. citizens' land claims against Spain up to $5 million.