1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MAXImum [283]
4 years ago
12

Which of the following is an incorrect way to avoid struck-by rolling hazards?

Business
2 answers:
fenix001 [56]4 years ago
7 0

Its A. Without someone there to navigate you someone can get ran over and have a strucky by rolling

finlep [7]4 years ago
3 0

The answer is: A.Position a worker to signal you when operating a vehicle in reverse gear without audible forward alarm

When operating vehicle in reverse gear, the operator cannot always see whether the worker who gives the signal able to see the moving vehicles or not.

Which is why an audible sound for moving vehicles is needed so the other workers could notify the location of your vehicles and avoid themselves from being crushed.

You might be interested in
Take It All Away has a cost of equity of 10.96 percent, a pretax cost of debt of 5.46 percent, and a tax rate of 40 percent. The
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

8.04%

Explanation:

The formula to compute WACC is shown below:

= Weightage of debt × cost of debt × ( 1- tax rate)  + (Weightage of  common equity × (cost of common equity)

= (0.38 × 5.46%) × ( 1 - 40%)  +  (0.62 × 10.96%)

= 1.24488% + 6.7952%

= 8.04%

The weightage of common equity would be

= 100% - 38%

= 62%

This is the answer and the same is not provided in the given options

7 0
3 years ago
Smith Corporation has ratio of 2.6. What is Smith's acid test (quick) ratio ds current assets of $11,400, inventories of $4,000,
NeX [460]

Answer:

Current ratio = <u>Current assets</u>

                        Current liabilities

   2.6             = <u>$11,400</u>

                        Current liabilities

Current liabilities = <u>$11,400</u>

                                 2.6

Current liabilities = $4,385

Quick ratio = <u>Current assets - Inventory</u>

                      Current liabilities

Quick ratio = <u>$11,400 - $4,000</u>

                      $4,385

Quick ratio = 1.69

Explanation:

Current ratio is the ratio of current assets to current liabilities. The current ratio and current assets have been provided in the question with the exception of current liabilities. Thus, we will make current liabilities the subject of the formula.

Quick ratio is calculated as current assets minus inventory divided by current liabilities. Since the current liabilities have been calculated. Then, we will divide the difference between current assets and inventory by current liabilities  so as to determine the quick ratio.

5 0
3 years ago
Assume rocky mountain railway is considering hiring a reservations agency to handle passenger reservations. The agency would cha
meriva
Alright, so we start out with $12000, and we'd add from there. Since we add 1$ for every passenger, our equation with p being the number of passengers would be 1*p (e.g. for 1 passenger we have 1*1=1, 2 passengers we have 1+1(2 times)=2). Substituting 50,000 for p, we have 1*50,000=50,000. Next, we have to add 12,000 to that (as that's a flat fee) to get 50000+12000=62000
6 0
4 years ago
Andersen's Nursery has sales of $318,400, costs of $199,400, depreciation expense of $28,600, interest expense of $1,100, and a
podryga [215]

Answer:

e. $42,438

Explanation:

The computation of the retained earning is shown below:

Earning after tax = Sales - cost - depreciation expense - interest expense - income tax expense

= $318,400 - $199,400 - $28,600 - $1,100 - $30362

= $58,938

The income tax expense equal to

= (Sales - cost - depreciation expense - interest expense) × tax rate

= ($318,400 - $199,400 - $28,600 - $1,100) × 0.34

= $30362

Now the retained earning equal to

= Earning after tax - dividend paid

= $58,938 - $16,500

= $42,438

7 0
3 years ago
If variable cost of goods sold totaled $90,000 for the year (18,000 units at $5.00 each) and the planned variable cost of goods
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

$10,800

Explanation:

The computation of effect on the quantity factor is shown below:-

Actual variable cost = 18,000 × $5

= $90,000

Planned variable cost = 16,000 × $5.40

= $86,400

Total change in contribution margin = Actual variable cost - Planned variable cost

$90,000 - $86,400

= $3,600

Change in quantity = 18,000 - 16,000

= 2,000 units

Effect on the quantity factor = Change in quantity × Cost per unit

= 2,000 units × $5.40

= $10,800

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Policy and standards often change as a result of business drivers. One such driver, known as ___________________, occurs when bu
    7·1 answer
  • How do you do 3 9/10 + 6.5
    6·1 answer
  • Last year, real gdp in an imaginary economy was $125 billion and the population was 5 million. this year, real gdp is $132 billi
    10·1 answer
  • A geologist is a part of what career field? A. Mining B. plant care C. agriculture
    14·1 answer
  • 1. 9.4. For process scheduling, does a low-priority value represent a low priority or a high priority?
    7·2 answers
  • Owners of coffee plantations in the country of Cantonica grow their own coffee beans and supply them to various stores and resta
    14·1 answer
  • Contents of a statement account ​
    12·1 answer
  • On January 1, Year 1, Barnes Company issued a $100,000 installment note. The note had a 10-year term and an 8 percent interest r
    6·1 answer
  • As chief financial officer, you want to send the fourth quarter profit/loss spreadsheets to the president of the company. How ca
    14·1 answer
  • Products whose demand rises when another product’s price increases are called.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!