Answer:
It is 33. Answer B is correct.
Answer:
3.75
Step-by-step explanation:
1.25x3=3.75 easy. you just need to times the height by length
Given:
In
.
To find:
The list of angles in order from least to greatest.
Solution:
In a triangle, the sides of triangles are completely depend on the interior of the triangle. In the triangle, the longest side has the largest opposite angle and the shortest side has the smallest opposite angle.
Arrange the sides of the triangle ACR in ascending order.


It means the order of the opposite angles to sides is:

Therefore, the list of angles in order from least to greatest is
.
Hey there Smarty!
This would be considered to be a (acute angel) which in this case, we would have to make sure that this whole triangle would equal less than 270 because each angle would be less than

°
If we add/multiply

.
So, we would have to know that was ever this would all add up to be, this would have to be less than 270°
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}\boxed{\boxed{(2.5+5) \\ \\ (2.5*2.5) \\ (2.5-2) \\ (2.5-1) \\}} \\ \\ this \ would \ be \ why \ I \ would \ say \\ that \ this \ would \ be \ the \ answer \end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%5Cboxed%7B%5Cboxed%7B%282.5%2B5%29%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%282.5%2A2.5%29%20%5C%5C%20%282.5-2%29%20%5C%5C%20%282.5-1%29%20%5C%5C%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20this%20%5C%20would%20%5C%20be%20%5C%20why%20%5C%20I%20%5C%20would%20%5C%20say%20%5C%5C%20that%20%5C%20this%20%5C%20would%20%5C%20be%20%5C%20the%20%5C%20answer%20%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%20%20)
I truly hope this helps, and also, it's kind of my
first time doing this I hope this would be helpful.
~Jurgen
Answer:
So you say you want some 5 digit numbers eh? Let’s consider some boundaries. 5 digit numbers range from 10,000 - 99,999. So our number is guaranteed to be between 0 and 90000.
Sometimes it’s much easier to work with concrete things. Such as the number of numbers that don’t contain any 3s. It’s really more difficult to put our finger on “at least 1” anything so we try to steer clear of it.
Anyways we’ve got 90000 numbers that have at least 1 or 0 3’s. Find one and we know the other.
So no 3’s at all right? Well you have 8 choices for the first digit (can’t choose 0 and you can’t choose 3). And then for the remaining 4 digits you have 9 choices. So that’s
8∗94=52488
Back to our initial equation, we have
90000−8∗94=37512 5 digits numbers without any 3s.
A quick (or maybe not so quick) matlab script confirms such calculations.
credits to : Trevor Squires