<span>Isolationism tends to be borne out of a sense of nativism: that is, the idea that we are the best country among others tends to make us wary of wanting to help other nations. In the '20s, this idea that we shouldn't entangle ourselves in the arguments of other nations led to the US taking an isolationist stance on world diplomatic matters.</span>
Answer:
<em>[The Suffrage and the Civil rights Movement] </em>
<em></em>
<em>(Reason's they are Alike):</em>
<em>1.</em>They are both Marches for Basically Freedom.
<em>2.</em>They both happened in the 1900's.
<em>3.</em>Both of the Movements are using banners and slogans to spread their message to civilians.
<em>4.</em>They are both peaceful and very well mannered.
<em>5.</em>The last similarity is that Both movements are protesting in the National's Capitol.
<em>(Reason's they are Different): </em>
<em>1.</em> In the suffrage Photo, Men wasn't apart of the march, instead they were more of spectating the whole thing.
<em>2.</em> Also in the suffrage photo it was just a small group Marching, not a huge one like the other Movement.
<em>3.</em> One group focuses on mainly particular goals while the other group uses slogans based on the French Revolution.
I believe the document is the Emancipation Proclamation, and it was issued by president Abraham Lincoln.
(Take this response with a grain of salt.)
I personally think that neither should determine that. Both questions are unable to determine whether the religion is true; so why would it be used to determine whether or not people have the right to follow it. However, putting that aside, I think the best answer would be how good their followers are. It doesn't determine whether the religion is true or not but it rids us of the toxic religions that spread negative messages. Considering how much racism, homophobia, transphobia, and sexism is in most religions it'd be interesting to see most religions cease.
Including commonly followed religions like Catholicism.
