This political involvement would likely be based on <u>"self-interest".</u>
The significance of self-interest at both the small scale and large scale levels of politics turns out to be clear once one looks not just at the "contributions" of a majority rules system but rather at its "yields" too. The commonness of intrigue gatherings, the brokenness of the United States impose code, the campaigning by associations for their individuals' self-interest, the reserves in the Patriot Act, the various instances of debasement in Western popular governments, and the disappointment of natives with their legislatures' failings all point to the significance of self-interest in politics.
The economic term for this is "opportunity cost".
Opportunity cost is the cost of the options that one is not choosing. This means that if one has to choose between A and B, opportunity cost is the cost of "giving up B" when one chooses A.
Hi! I'm not sure if there would be a question or choices in this item but I'd like to answer this. The use of rules, regulation, and authority to guide performance is referred to as a bureaucratic control. My answer is bureaucratic or bureaucratic control.
<span>The Met acquired its first object, a Roman sarcophagus, two years before it even had a building in which to exhibit it. So it's True </span>
The first sit in of the4 students prompted more outrage from whites that did not want to change their local customs.
