One impact the importation of cotton had on great britain was that it fueled lots of the Industrial Revolution, which was heavily dependent on cotton to duel the booming textile industry. <span />
Both plans involved how the new Constitution would define representation in Congress. The Virginia Plan proposed that the number of delegates be based upon population, thus favoring larger states with more people. The New Jersey Plan proposed that each state have an equal number of delegates, thus favoring smaller states with fewer people.
Under the Virginia Plan, a state like Virginia would have had a much greater say in Congress than smaller New Jersey since Virginia had a larger population. Under the New Jersey Plan, New Jerseyans would have had a disproportionate say relative to Virginians. Consider this, if each state had two delegates (under the NJ Plan) let's say New Jersey had 500,000 people and Virginia had 1,000,000 (not the real numbers). With two delegates, New Jersey would have had 1 say in Congress per 250,000 voters while Virginia would have had 1 say in Congress per 500,000 voters.
These differences were resolved by creating a bicameral legislature. Today, the House of Representatives is a remnant of the Virginia Plan. States with larger populations have more seats in the House than those with smaller populations. For example, California has far more Representatives than Wyoming meaning California has a much greater say in the House. The Senate, on the other hand, is a remnant of the New Jersey Plan. Each state has two Senators regardless of population, which means each state has an equal say. Again, California has two Senators and Wyoming has two Senators despite the fact that California is much larger than Wyoming - this gives Wyoming a much greater say per voters than California. No law can pass through Congress without approval from both chambers of Congress, which means that smaller states are not overpowered, while larger states still have the ability to set the agenda.
Answer: Despite the ruling of the Supreme Court that the Cherokee was a sovereign nation, the forcible removal of the Cherokee was carried out by the state of Georgia. The Cherokee however argued that they had negotiated treaties with the United State federal government that had granted them the rights to these lands. The Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee were a separate, independent nation with a right to retain their lands. President Jackson did not however enforce the court decision, and the state of Georgia continue the policy of removing them from their own land.
To start with you can do.....
Dear family,
i am joining the confederate army because i need more money and i thought i would the family i wont becoming back in a while but i will be vivisiting tell all my chindren i love them tell my wife i love her.<span>First I think you need to understand that I in no way support the abhorrent institution that was Slavery in the United States prior to the ratification of the 13th amendment. However it did exist and was guaranteed by law and the Constitution. No this did not make it right, but there it is. Reading literature of the time and many political speeches you find it referred to in many veiled ways.i really hope you understand i love you all.
- from blah blah blah</span>
Answer: The most obvious example for this is from the battle of the bulge, where hitler tried to turn the tide agansit the american forces by reapeting the strategy he did against the french 5 years ago. Trying to punch a hole through the enemy lines and use tanks to mop up the infantry. This worked to some degree, with an american force being trapped in a town during the battle.
