1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arlecino [84]
3 years ago
5

Why would it be problematic for the legislative or executive branches to interpret the laws too?

History
1 answer:
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch enforces the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. Acting as a check on each other, the legislative branch cannot make a law that would be unenforceable or unconstitutional. The executive branch cannot make up its laws to enforce; only the legislative branch.

You might be interested in
What religious change in Europe reflected and enlightenment ideals?
Reptile [31]
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice. The religious change in Europe that reflected enlightenment ideals is the individual freedom of religion. <span>I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1.Magna Carta
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Enlightenment with answers

1. 2

Supported reforms

Believed in natural rights and religious toleration Viewed themselves as servants of their state

4. 3

Which statement represents a key idea directly associated with John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government?

1. Freedomofspeechshouldbedenied.

2. Theking’spoweronEarthcomesfromGod.

3. Allpeoplearebornwiththerighttolife,liberty,

and property.

4. Individualsactingintheirownself-interestwill

achieve economic success.

5. 4

Base your answer to the question on the passage below and on your knowledge of social studies.

...The document so frantically cobbled together was stunning in its sweep and simplicity. Never once mentioning king, nobility, or church, it declared the “natural, inalienable and sacred rights of man” to be the foundation of any and all government. It assigned sovereignty to the nation, not the king, and pronounced everyone equal before the law, thus opening positions to talent and merit and implicitly eliminating all privilege based on birth. More striking than any particular guarantee, however, was the universality of the claims made. References to “men,” “man,” “every man,” “all men,” “all citizens,” “each citizen,” “society,” and “every society” dwarfed the single reference to the French people....

—Lynn Hunt, Inventing Human Rights: A History, W. W. Norton & Company

This passage discusses ideals most directly associated with the

1. Golden Age of Islam 3. Reformation 2. Reign of Charlemagne 4. Enlightenment

In the 18th century, European leaders that fit these characteristics were best known as

1. theocratic monarchs 2. enlightened despots

3. totalitarian dictators 4. prime ministers

2. 4

Which writer opposed political absolutism?

1. NiccolòMachiavelli

2. JamesI

3. Jacques-BénigneBossuet 4. JohnLocke

3. 1

Which idea is central to John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government?

1. Agovernment’spowercomesfromtheconsent

5 0
3 years ago
What did the neutrality acts keep the u.s. from doing?
Artyom0805 [142]
After a fierce debate in Congress, in November of 1939, a final Neutrality Act<span>passed. This </span>Act<span> lifted the arms embargo and put all trade with belligerent nations under the terms of “cash-and-carry.” The ban on loans remained in effect, and</span>American<span> ships were barred from transporting goods to belligerent ports.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explica una razón para él por el cambio en la población urbana en el noroeste de 1870 a 1900
Vikki [24]
<span>Una de las principales razones fue el comienzo de la era Industrial, que trajo una repentina oleada de inmigración.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Was the United States Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family? And give me a reason why?
dezoksy [38]
No, the courts decision was not fair to him. Dred Scott was told that he would be set free and yet he wasn’t, therefore the decision to have him remain a slave was unfair.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would education have led middle class women to address social problems?
    12·1 answer
  • The system of making the loser of the presidential election vice president was ended because:
    8·2 answers
  • What factor determines the location of each voter's polling place?
    10·1 answer
  • The United States Supreme Court has the power to?
    6·2 answers
  • how did the institution of slavery develop and why did it develop differently in the chesapeake, the carolina low country (coast
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP
    15·1 answer
  • How is public opinion measured in America
    11·2 answers
  • Which did the british do during the buildup to the american revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • Can ordinary people be heroes? Have you ever done something heroic? Write your response in complete sentences and use examples.
    15·2 answers
  • Why does De Bow feel that it is important to show that the Bible sanctions slavery?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!