People frequently harbor a variety of biases. Due to author bias, the writers of the two texts present the same event in different ways.
An author who is prejudiced is simply one who, in some manner, did not pay attention to all the facts, or evidence, or build a logical case to support his or her opinions.
In this context, bias is simply defined as when a point or remark demonstrates partiality or preference for a person, thing, etc. When you suspect a source may be prejudiced, when the author's viewpoint is strongly held or skewed, etc., you can usually tell.
Prejudice is a synonym for bias, which means that the arguments used to justify a position are frequently irrational. To assess an argument's worth and validity impartially, the reader must be able to identify any author's prejudice.
To learn more about author bias
brainly.com/question/24460194
#SPJ4
I agree. No acts of kindness go not noticed.
I don't know if there were any options, but something that is at heart of a democracy is popular sovereignty: the belief that the power is in the hands of the people.
In a representative democracy those people are represented by some people chosen, to make the democracy easier to work.
alternatively you could say a body of laws: legislature or a constitution.
Answer:
It's the mother at the hospital.
Explanation:
Answer: Limiting Factor
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
