People frequently harbor a variety of biases. Due to author bias, the writers of the two texts present the same event in different ways.
An author who is prejudiced is simply one who, in some manner, did not pay attention to all the facts, or evidence, or build a logical case to support his or her opinions.
In this context, bias is simply defined as when a point or remark demonstrates partiality or preference for a person, thing, etc. When you suspect a source may be prejudiced, when the author's viewpoint is strongly held or skewed, etc., you can usually tell.
Prejudice is a synonym for bias, which means that the arguments used to justify a position are frequently irrational. To assess an argument's worth and validity impartially, the reader must be able to identify any author's prejudice.
To learn more about author bias
brainly.com/question/24460194
#SPJ4
Answer:
the loss of land to national parks
Explanation:
Answer:
Automatic stabilizers are policies that adjust, as the name implies, automatically, to economic conditions.
An example of an automatic stabilizer is a progressive tax scheme that adjusts rates depending on whether the economy is growing or in recession. If the economy is growing, the tax rates will rise for those who are earning more income, and if the economy is in recession, the tax rates will go down for everyone.
Another example is unemployment benefits. They will increase when the economy is doing poorly and more people are unemployed, and the will decrease in the opposite situation.
The biggest advantage of automatic stabilizers is, as economist Mark Thoma explains, that they do not need to pass through congress to become effective.
The free soil party i think :)
The Free Soil Party was a short-lived coalition political party in the United States active from 1848 to 1854, when it merged into the Republican Party. The party was largely focused on the single issue of opposing the expansion of slavery into the western territories of the United States.
