People high in social dominance orientation tend to support policies that maintain hierarchies. According this fact, the following is true: social dominance orientation reflects the extent to which: people value social hierarchy.
A person high in social dominance <span>is most likely to support a policy, such as tax cuts for the wealthy, that maintains hierarchies.</span>
Answer: The intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements
(1) The defendant must act intentionally or recklessly.
(2) The defendant's conduct must be extreme and outrageous:
(3) The defendants act is the cause of the distress
(4) Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct.
Explanation:
Intentional or reckless act: It is not necessary that an act be intentionally offensive. A reckless disregard for the likelihood of causing emotional distress is sufficient.
Extreme and outrageous conduct:
The conduct must be horrible and beyond the standards of civilized decency or utterly intolerable in a civilized society. Whether the conduct is illegal does not determine whether it meets this standard.
Cause of the distress: The actions of the defendant must have actually caused the plaintiff's emotional distress beyond the bounds of decency.
Plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress as a result of defendant's conduct: This standard is quantified by the intensity, duration, and any physical manifestations of the distress.
It's the practical-ish solution for individuals seeking monetary remedies too low in proportion to attorney fees, and requiring more legally binding enforcement measures than those provided by mediation/arbitration. The ish suffix indicates that it's not the democratized "people's court" that everyone thinks it is... We've found that it's not very useful for low-income, immigrant or shy folks which either don't feel confident enough, or are so ensnared by the legal system that they never think small claims court a viable solution for their problems.
<span>It also plays a great entertainment role, apparently, given the popularity of daytime shows such as that of the assertive Mrs. Judge Judy.</span>
The answer to this question will be B
Answer:
During World War II, Victory Gardens were planted by families in the United States (the Home Front) to help prevent a food shortage. This meant food for everyone! Planting Victory Gardens helped make sure that there was enough food for our soldiers fighting around the world.
Explanation:
