Answer:
exclusive dealing
Explanation:
Exclusive dealing -
It is the method , where a deal is set up between a specific supplier and the wholesaler or the retailer , where the no other distributor would be able to receive the supply , is referred to as exclusive dealing.
In this scenario no other dealer can not handle the product in any case.
Hence , from the scenario of the question,
The correct option is exclusive dealing .
Due to scarce resources, every individual, whether rich or poor, faces an opportunity cost when choosing to produce or consume more of one good over another.
<h3>What is the problem with scarce resources?</h3>
The gap between scarce resources and hypothetically unbounded needs is referred to as scarcity and is a fundamental economic issue. In order to meet both basic necessities and as many additional wants as feasible, people must decide how to spend resources effectively.
The value of the best option foregone is the opportunity cost of a decision. The state of not being able to obtain all the commodities and services one desires is known as scarcity. It exists because there are more commodities and services that people demand than can be produced with all of the available resources.
Learn more about Opportunity costs here:
brainly.com/question/13036997
#SPJ4
Alice is willing to spend $30 on a pair of jeans, and has a coupon for $10 off she found online. She selects and purchases a $35 pair of jeans, pre-discount.
(Alice's consumer surplus, $5)
<span>Jeff finds some steaks for $16 for which he would have been willing to pay $20. The butcher notices the meat is near the expiration date and gives him an extra 75% off. </span>
(Jeff's consumer surplus, $16)
<span>Nicole has in her possession a hockey puck from the 2010 Winter Olympic Games and sells it on eBay. She will only sell the puck if the winning bid is greater than or equal to $500. After bidding closes, the last bid stands at $500. </span>
(Nicole's producer surplus, $0)
<span>Claire is trying to sell her used calculus textbook online. She asks for $150 or best offer and is willing to sell for anything over $100. She is able to sell it for $125. </span>
(Claire's producer surplus, $25)
<span>Roy is willing to pay $2.50 for a sports drink. He notices the price is $2.79 and chooses not to purchase a sports drink. (Roy's consumer surplus, $0)</span>
Answer:
Sunk cost
Explanation:
-Incremental cost is the total cost of producing an additional unit.
-Sunk cost is a cost that has already been paid and that it is not possible to get it back.
-Out-of-pocket cost is a cost that requires a direct payment in the actual period.
-Opportunity cost is the cost of not receiving a benefit when you choose an alernative over another one.
-Period cost is a cost that is not associated with the production of goods.
According to this, the answer is that the $14 per unit is a sunk cost because the company has already spent that manufacturing the products and it is not able to recover that money.
Answer
Miguel must set aside $62,745 annually
Explanation
N = Number of years till Miguel would retire = 43 years
FV = Future Value = $1,000,000
r = Interest rate = 10%
PMT = Annual payments (at the ending of the year) = ?? The question asks us to calculate this
We would use the future value ordinary annuity formula to calculate PMT
FV = PMT ![[\frac{(1+r )^{N} -1}{r} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2Br%20%29%5E%7BN%7D%20-1%7D%7Br%7D%20%5D)
1000000 = PMT ![[\frac{(1+0.10 )^{10} -1}{0.10} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2B0.10%20%29%5E%7B10%7D%20-1%7D%7B0.10%7D%20%5D)
PMT ≅ $62,745
Miguel must set aside $62,745 annually
