1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
algol13
3 years ago
10

What does "one cannot justify war unless each side flaunts its own blind conviction." mean?

History
1 answer:
Anettt [7]3 years ago
8 0
<span>This means that there is no reason to go to war unless both sides of the argument are unable to see and understand what the other side is trying to justify. Having a conviction in a cause or a belief without looking at the other side of the coin and trying to understand what might be seen as an uncomfortable viewpoint is what often leads to skirmishes and wars.</span>
You might be interested in
What are the main causes of the scientific revolution​
Elanso [62]

Answer: Causes: Renaissance encouraged curiosity, investigation, discovery, modern day knowledge. Caused people to question old beliefs. During the era of the Scientific Revolution, people began using experiments and mathematics to understand mysteries.

Effects: New discoveries were made, old beliefs began to be proven wrong

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Who was the king of the Jewish people for 40 years?
Mashcka [7]
I believe king David.
4 0
3 years ago
What are the primary roles of government in a market economy?
topjm [15]

Answer:

1.To provide the legal and social framework

2.to maintain competition

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What did Philip ll want his palace to desmonstrate about his monarchy
kiruha [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

That he was a strong and religious king. ... He  involved himself in every aspect of government, he trusted no one but himself, he built an imposing palace to impress people, he tried to force his subjects to accept his religion, he raised taxes.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The rights against unreasonable search and seizure, as well as against the quartering of soldiers, imply which of the rights lis
atroni [7]
Search and seizure would mean something like the government taking your cell phone and going through every message you've ever sent, or entering your home and searching through all your dresser drawers.  They need to have a court-approved reasonable cause for doing something that invasive.
Quartering of soldiers would mean soldiers would have the right to enter your home and expect you to provide them food and lodging.  That's pretty invasive too.
In either case, we're talking about invasions of your privacy, your personal space.  Court justices have used statements like those about search and seizure and quartering of soldiers to show that the constitution does give attention to citizen's right to privacy, even if not using the exact term "right to privacy."
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Writings that contain accounts of the life and teaching of Jesus
    5·2 answers
  • How did militarism and alliances help cause WW1
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the woman who led the people of Israel to defend itsen against
    15·1 answer
  • All of these statements about the enlightenment and ancient scholars are correct except _____.
    11·1 answer
  • According to the article, what was the "mission" of the spanish armada
    14·1 answer
  • The conservative party that ruled through the 1980s and early 1990s was replaced by which political party?
    12·1 answer
  • Which event was most responsible for richard nixon's announcement at the end of the indian termiation policy
    9·1 answer
  • Alin sa mga binanggit na pananaw ang higit mong pinaniniwalaan ? magbigay ng katwiran.​
    6·1 answer
  • I need answers for these 2
    6·1 answer
  • How did early industrialization contribute to westward expansion?<br>​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!