Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
Looking at number 4, you first have to look at the information that you have:
On tuesday he practiced for 1 5/6 hrs
Monday he practiced for 7/10 hrs
He is supposed to practice for 1 1/4 hr.
You could write questions like:
How much more did Marco practice on Tuesday than he is supposed to practice?
This works because it does indeed involve subtraction, you would be subtracting the amount that he should have practiced from the amount of time that he did practice.
If I didn't answer the question, please message me and I will clarify!
False irrationals number have no end with no patterns (example would be pi)
Traffic rules are set by each individual state.
In most states, an intersection where traffic lights are out of order
is treated as if it were a 4-way STOP.
But you can't depend on this answer. You MUST determine what
the law is in the state where you're driving. And if you drive out of
state, it may change for you.
