Answer:
The answer is $2,225,000
Explanation:
Cost of acquisition is $1,775,000
Meyer company's share of net income in Gannon corporation:
60% of $1,000,000
0.6 x $1,000,000
= $600,000
Meyer company's share from cash dividend in Gannon corporation
60% of $250,000
0.6 x $250,000
= $150,000
The balance in the equity investment account at December 31, 2021 should be:
$1,775,000 + $600,000 – $150,000
= $2,225,000
Given, Operating income = 7,200
Fixed expenses = 1800
Let the target sales be assumed to be X
Sales = 7200 + 1800 + 0.6*Sales
X = 7200 +1800 +0.6X
X-0.6X = 9000
0.4X =9000
X = 22,500
Target Sales = 22,500
Break even point = Fixed Costs/(Price -Variable cost)
Break even point = 1,800/(1-0.6) = 1,800/0.4 = 4,500
Break even point =4,500
Margin of Safety = (Target sales - break even point)/ Target Sales
Margin of Safety = (22,500-4,500)/22,500 = 18,000/22,500 = 0.8 = 80%
Margin of Safety =80%
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
Answer:
$294,600
Explanation:
Given that,
September sales = $303,000
October sales = $289,000
Monthly sales are 80% credit and 20% cash.
Of the credit sales, 50% are collected in the month of sale, and 50% are collected in the following month.
Cash collections for the month of October:
= 20% of October sales + 50% of the credit sales in October + 50% of the credit sales in September
= (0.2 × $289,0000 + (0.5 × 0.8 × $289,000) + (0.5 × 0.8 × $303,000)
= $57,800 + $115,600 + $121,200
= $294,600
Answer:
11%
Explanation:
Average cost of automobiles in 2013 = $15,500
Average cost of automobiles now = $17,205
Change in average cost = $17,205 - $15,500
= $1,705
Rate of increase in cost is the ratio between the increase and the average cost before the increase.
Rate of increase = ($1,705/$15,500) × 100%
= 11%
The rate of increase for these automobiles between the two time periods is 11%.
