1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
3 years ago
9

Bassett Corporation has two production departments, Milling and Customizing. The company uses a job-order costing system and com

putes a predetermined overhead rate in each production department. The Milling Department's predetermined overhead rate is based on machine-hours and the Customizing Department's predetermined overhead rate is based on direct labor-hours. At the beginning of the current year, the company had made the following estimates:
Machining Customizing
Machine-hours 17,000 15,000
Direct labor-hours 3,000 6,000
Total fixed manufacturing overhead cost $102,000 $61,200
Variable manufacturing overhead per machine-hour $1.70
Variable manufacturing overhead per direct labor-hour $4.10

During the current month the company started and finished Job T268. The following data were recorded for this job:

Job T268: Machining Customizing
Machine-hours 80 30
Direct labor-hours 30 50
Direct materials $720 $380
Direct labor cost $900 $1,500
If the company marks up its manufacturing costs by 40% then the selling price for Job T268 would be closest to: (Round your intermediate calculations to 2 decimal places.)

a. $6,763.40
b. $7,440.00
c. $4,831.00
d. $1,932.40
Business
1 answer:
Ludmilka [50]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

a. $6,763.40

Explanation:

The computation of the selling price is shown below:

But before that the predetermined overhead rate is

For machining

= ($102000 ÷ 17,000) + $1.70

= $7.7 per machine hour

For fabrication

= ($61200 ÷ 6000) + $4.10

= $14.30 per labour hour

Now the selling price is

Direct material ($720 + $380) $1,100

Direct labor ($900 + $1,500) $2,400

Machining department overhead (7.7 × 80) $616

Fabrication department overhead (50 × 14.3) $715

Total manufacturing cost $4,831

Markup 40% $1,932.40

Selling price $6,763.40

You might be interested in
Following is the income statement for Target Corporation. Prepare Target's common-size income statement for the fiscal year ende
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

Target Corporation

Common-Size Income Statement

Year ended:                                                                   January 28, 2012

Sales revenue                                                                       100.0%

Cost of sales                                                                               61.8%

Selling, general and administrative expenses                       18.2%

Depreciation and amortization                                               2.8%

Earnings from continuing operations before interest

expense and income taxes                                                        18.5%

Net interest expense                                                                1.1%

Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes      17.4%

Provision for income taxes                                                        2%

Net earnings from continuing operations                                15.4%

Every line item in the income statement is divided by the sales revenue.

Explanation:

Fiscal year ended January 28, 2012

Sales = $77,466

Net credit card revenues = 1,399

Cost of sales = 47,860

Selling, general and administrative expenses = 14,106

Credit card expenses = 446

Depreciation and amortization = 2,131

Earnings before interest expense and income taxes = 14,322

Net interest expense = 866

Earnings before income taxes = 13,456

Provision for income taxes = 1,527

Net earnings = $11,929

3 0
3 years ago
Please, help, I will award brainliest!
AysviL [449]

For lower income people:

The more the government puts towards health care would mean there would be a higher quality of life for low income areas allowing them to get access to needed healthcare for no cost to them.

For higher income people / corporate entities:

it would mean higher taxes on the 1% and 0.1% of the richer people and raising taxes on corporations such as higher taxes on dividends.

Summary:

For a SoL on one side to change another side would have to lose.

3 0
3 years ago
the u.s. department of veterans affairs (va) has undertaken three separate electronic health record system upgrade projects, non
Dovator [93]

The u.s. department of veterans affairs used the waterfall software development approach would likely have benefit  because it offers wide variety to accommodate and collect data.

Software upgradation in an organisation is a bit difficult and managing them individually according to the departments and an integrated software can only accommodate and collect data properly.

The development approach here also signifies a good team of people who can actually apply software development techniques that can easily be used by everyone in the firm.

To learn more about development approach here,

brainly.com/question/4326945

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
For an economy starting at potential output, a decrease in planned investment in the short run results in a(n):
Kruka [31]

Question:

For an economy starting at potential output, a decrease in autonomous expenditure in the short-run results in a(n):

A. increase in potential output

B. recessionary output gap

C. decrease in potential output

D.  expansionary output gap

Answer:

The correct answer is B

Explanation:

A decrease in autonomous expenditure shifts the Planned Aggregate Expenditure curve downward thus creating a lower equilibrium output.

PAE = C + Ip + G + NX

where

PAE  = Planned Aggregate Expenditure

C = consumption

Ip = Investment Spending

G = Government Spending

NX =  Net Export

If an economy has its output equal to its potential, this will create a reduction in short-run equilibrium output leading to a recessionary output gap.

Cheers!

6 0
4 years ago
Trusper Company was organized on January 1, Year 1 and has had 1,000 shares of $200 par value, 10% cumulative preferred stock ou
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

$50,000

Explanation:

Generally, preferred stockholders receive dividends earlier than common stockholders. Moreover, as the preference shareholders are cumulative, if they do not receive dividends current year, they will receive in the next year. Finally, preferred dividend is fixed until there are new issuance of preferred stock.

Preferred dividends for Year 1 = 1,000 shares × $200 × 10% = $20,000

For year 2 = $20,000

Given, total dividends in year 1 = $15,000

Therefore, company provides $15,000 to preferred dividends. No common dividends in year 1.

However, in the next year (Year 2), the company will pay $5,000 + $20,000 = $25,000 to preferences shareholders.

Therefore, remaining dividends are for common stockholders.

Year 2 common stockholders dividends = $75,000 - $25,000 = $50,000.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When performing the management _____ function, managers measure the results of operations and compare them with the results they
    9·1 answer
  • During the period, labor costs incurred on account amounted to $175,000, including $150,000 for production orders and $25,000 fo
    10·1 answer
  • True or false?
    12·2 answers
  • From the appearance of the utility function, we know that 2 a. Britney is risk averse. b. Britney gains less satisfaction when h
    15·1 answer
  • Wright Corporation began its operations on September 1 of the current year. Budgeted sales for the first three months of busines
    5·1 answer
  • The stockholders’ equity accounts of Martinez Corporation on January 1, 2020, were as follows:
    13·1 answer
  • Suppose the chester company expands to other markets with good designs, high awareness and easy accessibility, what strategy wou
    11·1 answer
  • HELP ME ASAPP ! Please don’t guess!
    11·1 answer
  • . You use the utility company’s budget plan for paying your home heating bills. You pay $75 per month for 9 months. Your actual
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose that a government that is skeptical of efforts to regulate prices charged by private companies is nevertheless concerned
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!