1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
myrzilka [38]
3 years ago
9

The senate should defer to the presidents choice of who he wants working under him

History
1 answer:
Goshia [24]3 years ago
8 0

Position A: The Senate should defer to the president's choice of who he wants working under him.

Position B: The Senate makes an independent assessment of the candidates in light of their suitability to serve the American people, even if it means denying the wishes of the president.

The question here favors position A. Given the powers vested in the president (and his ability to veto any decision) it is favorable if the people working under him are appointed by him and unless his/her qualifications are questionable, such a candidate should be approved by the Senate to avoid any show-down with the president (and the possibility that he will veto the senate's decisions). A hand-picked team will also enable the president to work more effectively and will maintain good relations between the president and the Senate. Additionally, since these nominees will be reporting to the president and will be his chief advisers, they should ideally be beholden only to him and not to the Senate; that way the president can be assured of candid and unbiased counsel. 

You might be interested in
What was a result of the United States' confusing and unclear war strategy in the 1970s?<br> .
ella [17]

Answer:

A. Public opinion about the war continued to decline.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What proof<br> is there that it was a Great Compromise?
pychu [463]

Answer:

it was recorded in many documents

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
If you combine two types of matter and energy is given off, what type of change is likely to have occurred? A. chemical change B
harkovskaia [24]
I think a chemical change. sorry if its wrong. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention do a good job? Give specific examples of what they did well or what they coul
Tom [10]
A convention of delegates from all the states except Rhode Island met in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in May of 1787. Known as the Constitutional Convention, at this meeting it was decided that the best solution to the young country's problems was to set aside the Articles of Confederation and write a new constitution.





Please mark me as a brainliest
3 0
2 years ago
The aqueducts were a water delivery system perfected by the
Otrada [13]
The correct answer is (D.) Romans
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The us buraeu of indian was formed to:
    12·1 answer
  • Organized in 1869. · Terrance Powderly was a famous leader. · Over 700,000 members at its peak. · Favored 8-hour work day, oppos
    10·2 answers
  • Did Rames the Great ruled for 6 years
    14·1 answer
  • the ancient G_____introduced many i____that i____the way we live today.The Greeks lived on small,rocky,p_____in southeast E____.
    11·2 answers
  • How did the writings of people like john locke lead colonists to resent the british government
    9·1 answer
  • How did the death of archduke frank instigate the collapse of peace for Europe?
    13·2 answers
  • I’m 1891 napoleon signed an agreement called the concordat with Pope Pius VII.
    8·1 answer
  • Can yall help me my brain is being slow
    14·1 answer
  • Which country was a member of the central powers?
    13·1 answer
  • How significant was WW2 in changing Australia’s relationship with Japan,British and USA
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!