Position A: The Senate should defer to the president's choice of who he wants working under him.
Position B: The Senate makes an independent assessment of the candidates in light of their suitability to serve the American people, even if it means denying the wishes of the president.
The question here favors position A. Given the powers vested in the president (and his ability to veto any decision) it is favorable if the people working under him are appointed by him and unless his/her qualifications are questionable, such a candidate should be approved by the Senate to avoid any show-down with the president (and the possibility that he will veto the senate's decisions). A hand-picked team will also enable the president to work more effectively and will maintain good relations between the president and the Senate. Additionally, since these nominees will be reporting to the president and will be his chief advisers, they should ideally be beholden only to him and not to the Senate; that way the president can be assured of candid and unbiased counsel.
The primary issue that created tension between FDR and southern democrats was that many of FDR's policies were spending tax money on poor black people, which many racist people in the South opposed.
The effect on China was a weakening of the dynasty, although it was temporarily sustained by the Europeans who were under the impression that the Boxer Rebellion was anti-Qing. China was also forced to pay almost $333 million in reparations.
European colonization of North America had a devastating effect on the native population. ... The natives, having no immunity died from diseases that the Europeans thought of as commonplace. They also brought guns, alcohol and horses. The effect of these was to change the way of life for the Native Americans.
