1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sasho [114]
3 years ago
9

Learning not to touch a hot stove after having been burned by it is an example of learning through __________.

Social Studies
2 answers:
Valentin [98]3 years ago
7 0
Learning through punishment

Learning through punishment refers to the phenomenon where an unpleasant response (or punishment) following a behavior or action, makes that behavior or action less likely to occur in the future. In this case, when you get burnt (response) by touching a hot stove (behavior/ action), you learn that touching a hot stove equates pain (an unpleasant response). Therefore, you learn not to touch a hot stove again in the future. 
aleksandr82 [10.1K]3 years ago
3 0
Learning not to touch a hot stove after having been burned by it is an example of experience learning. <span>In this case, someone has been burned before after touching a hot stove, because of that, the remember and learn not to touch a hot stove again because they could be burned. Their first experience of touching the hot stove reminds them that would happen if they were to do that again. </span>
You might be interested in
How were Egypt and Nubia's empires different
Tcecarenko [31]
There were not many differences between Egypt and Nubia, but the ones that existed were significant enough to constitute their authority as separate ancient states. The Nile River, the lifeblood of the two civilizations and their founding site, had great impact on both societies through their use of it for irrigation and transportation. Despite the difference in availability of information and written records between the two civilizations, scholars today are still able to infer, and sometimes figure out, what the differences between the societies were based off recovered artifacts. Egypt had many more written records than Nubia, probably because Egypt adopted hieroglyphic writing about 3200 BCE, and Nubia adopted their own writing system of Meroitic about 500 BC, though this Meroitic writing still is not understandable by scholars. The differences, nonetheless, were visible and pronounced in each society, and led to different economic, social, and political standards and cultural practices in each state.
The economic differences between Nubia and Egypt were mostly seen through trade, though they also revealed themselves through other means. First of all, the two countries traded different items and served as trade “corridors” to each other. Egypt had no route to the rest of Africa except through Nubia, and Nubia had no route to Asia except through Egypt. They depended on one another for their cooperation, though that isn’t to say they went without their quarrels.
The next aspect of Nubian and Egyptian difference, despite their abundant similarities, was their social and political organization. At the bottom of the social hierarchy came peasants and slaves; these supplied the hard labor for the agricultural societies of Egypt and Nubia. Next came the governmental and military workers. Egypt was organized into a complex bureaucracy that gave positions of power based on merit, not birth. This gave more people of common birth a chance to advance in society, a feature very different from most ancient societies. Almost immediately after the peasants and government workers came the rulers, or ruler in Egypt’s case. The Egyptian leader, the pharaoh, was theoretically an absolute leader, which did not give much room for a class of nobles as in other ancient societies. The pharaohs built giant tombs for themselves called pyramids, which still stand today as testament to their power. Meanwhile, Nubia was organized into a kingdom, which meant the ruling class was made up of a king and his nobles who supervised the lower classes. Nubia’s social organization was resemblant of Mesopotamia’s, despite the fact that it was farther away than Egypt. Nubian rulers did not build giant pyramids, but still organized lavish smaller pyramids for themselves with riches stored inside. Despite these differences, patriarchal societies emerged in both Egypt and Nubia. Men governed their households and their countries, with little exception, though women still had more influence in society than in Mesopotamia.
Finally, the differences in culture between Egypt and Nubia were obvious and notable. Writing, specifically, was a major cultural difference between these two societies. Egypt, a country famous for its pictographic and ideographic hieroglyphic writing, developed this form of communication by 3200 BCE, possibly as a result of Mesopotamian influence. However, hieroglyphics were cumbersome and time-consuming to write in, so Hieratic emerged at almost the same time as hieroglyphics as a more simple and condensed way of writing than the “priestly” script. While Nubia initially adopted all Egyptian ways of writing and communication, they later developed their own way of communicating. This new form of communication was called Meroitic, and it was so unique from all other ancient languages that scholars are still not able to understand it today. The religions of the two societies were also very different, though Egyptian influence shone through in Nubian religion. Egyptian religion was largely based off sun cults, such as those of Amon, Re, and Aten, though cults such as those of Osiris also emerged. Mummification was also a practice frequented by the wealthy and influential in Egypt, as it was believed to facilitate the transition of the body from one life to another. Nubian religious practices, while adopting some of the same gods and rituals as Egypt, also developed its own distinct gods and customs.
<span>The differences of Egypt and Nubia were not clear on the surface. Egypt wielded great influence over Nubia in its early, weaker days, in all aspects of the Nubian society. However, later in history, Nubia was able to build more of its own culture, and ended up being a distinct, individual, and important society in ancient history.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Because it is usually inductive, qualitative research cannot use theoretical sampling.
Lorico [155]

The correct answer is True.

Explanation:  Theoretical sampling is a term coined by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967 in the context of social research to describe the process of choosing new research fields or new research cases to compare with others that have already been studied. This is one of the tools of qualitative research.

4 0
3 years ago
A psychologist develops a new treatment for depression in the united states that involves teaching people techniques to increase
yarga [219]

I believe the answer is: No, depressed people in Eastern cultures do not devalue themselves like depressed people in Western cultures.

Eastern culture place a really high value on hardwork more than the western culture. So, people in eastern culture tend to see the act of succumbing to depression as being weak, which make them tend to deal it by working even harder to accomplish positive in life.

6 0
3 years ago
In the ________ view of leadership, the leader is the key force in determining the success of an organization.
marta [7]

In the romantic view of leadership, the leader is the key force is determining the success of an organization.

An organization or organization is an entity, such as a company, institution, or association, made up of one or more people and having a specific purpose. The word comes from the Greek word organon, which means tool or instrument, instrument or organ.

An organization is a group of people working together, such as a neighborhood association, charity, association, or business. The word organization can be used to refer to a group or corporation or the act of forming or establishing something.

An organization is an official group of people such as a political party, business, charity or club.

Learn more about organization here:brainly.com/question/19334871
#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
How did europeans and people of european descent gain, consolidate and maintain power in africa
Ede4ka [16]

Answer: They gained all of that because they had the manpower and modern weapons to do it. People in Africa at the time didn't really have much.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ________ is(are) considered to be an abnormality of rem sleep.
    6·1 answer
  • The easement that is not created for the benefit of the land owned by the owner of the easement, but that attaches personally to
    8·1 answer
  • Why did a group know as theologians arise during the Ran empire rather than the Ronan republic
    6·1 answer
  • Unless they face major trade barriers, the industries in any country tend to produce products for which they have a _____, which
    7·1 answer
  • Choose the scenario that best matches the nonverbal communication function.
    13·1 answer
  • A group of people is waiting to be helped at a customer service desk in a store. A woman in the waiting area suddenly clears her
    8·1 answer
  • Take these Elements of Roman culture and their creators to categorize them.
    8·1 answer
  • Human eye colors are found on a spectrum that ranges from completely pigmented (dark brown eyes) to a complete lack of pigment (
    12·1 answer
  • My teacher is asking
    9·1 answer
  • Which example highlights political equality?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!