They have longer periods of revolution.
The introduction of foxes in order to control, or even decline, the rapidly growing rabbit population was not effective due to very simple reasons, reproduction rates and available area for living.
The rabbits are reproducing quicker than the foxes, and not just quicker, but in larger numbers with every lither, thus outnumbering the foxes by far, even if each fox manages to kill a rabbit or two each day.
The area available for the rabbits to live and spread out is huge, so they are not limited by a small amount of area where their number will have to stop to grow because of lack of food sources, thus spreading around without any problem, especially because of the lack of competition.
Answer:
Explanation:
<h2>
Homotropic effector-</h2>
<h2>Both -</h2>
The phrase 
is relevant and can be applied for homotropic effector molecules since the heterotropic effector molecules have the possibility and affinity to change the sigmoidal curve to a more potential hyperbolic curve contingent upon the allosteric effector to be positive or negative modulator.
The expression isn't relevant for both homotropic and heterotrophic effectors since the two of them can tie to the allosteric site of allosteric enzymatic compounds.
The phrase 
is significant and can be applied for both homotropic and heterotropic effectors.
The expression 
is significant and applied for homotropic effectors just as when substrate molecules tie to the allosteric site of enzyme then it is regarded as homotropic effectors. The heterotropic effectors are effectors apart from substrate molecules.
The phrase 
is not applied and insignificant to none of the heterotropic or homotropic effector molecules since 
is significant for the enzymes that obey the Michaelis-Menten equation, but allosteric enzymes do not obey the Michaelis-Menten equation. Homotropic and heterotropic effectors are viable and efficient for allosteric enzymatic chemicals that don't contain
Gametophytes are photosynthetic & have root-like rhizoids.
Answer:
Medulla.
By analyzing the DNA extracted from the hair follicle, the medullary index and the pattern of medulla in the hair samples obtained from a crime scene, an investigator can identify the owner.
Explanation:
The hair consists of follicle and shaft. The follicle is the part of the skin, where the hair grows and the hair shaft has three layers: an inner medulla, a cortex, and an outer cuticle.
The morphology (physical characteristics) of hair provides a broad detail on the racial background of an individual and an investigator can identify a group of people who share similar traits. But the hair without follicle cells attached to it, cannot be used to identify a specific individual. If the follicle of a hair is present, then it can lead to individual identification by DNA analysis. Also the medulla of animals is larger than that in the humans. By comparing the medullary index (the ratio of the diameter of the medulla to the diameter of the entire hair), it can be determined if the hair obtained from crime scene belongs to animals or humans. The macroscopic (length, color, and curliness) and microscopic characteristics ( pattern of the medulla, pigmentation of the cortex, and types of scales on the cuticle) of the hair samples are studied during a crime investigation. If the entire hair follicle (follicular tag) is present in the hair samples found at the crime scene, the blood and tissue attached to the follicle is extracted and analyzed using DNA profiling. DNA analysis of the hair follicle provides an identification with greater accuracy than the hair shaft.
