The political party used propaganda
Answer:
To the side of the communication trenches facing the enemy were excavated the trenches. These trenches were utilized to move troops, supplies, and equipment. While Britain depended on its men to transport supplies to advanced positions, the French frequently used tramways.
<h2>How did the trenches change World War I?</h2>
The Great War was not altered by the trenches alone! Two to three thousand years prior, trenches had already been excavated. Trenches were excavated by the Greeks, the Romans, the Normans, and the Crusaders; even Napoleon and his troops constructed trenches. The soldier is taught how to dig a trench in any military manual, whether it be an Austrian, British, French, German, Italian, or Russian one. The Boar War, the Manchurian War, and the American Civil War all saw the employment of trenches. Since previous battles were included in military history studies and official history textbooks, trenches were well-known and did not significantly alter the Great War. The Great War was altered by a number of causes. The lethal potential of contemporary weaponry, along with field defenses like trenches with a frontal barbed-wire fence and reinforced concrete block buildings (often referred to as pillboxes in English), mixed with the sheer numbers of men in the massive armies of the opposing sides. The military leadership of the various European countries, with the exception of the British Army (because they had a small professional army as opposed to the mass conscript European armies), were aware of all these factors prior to the start of the war, yet they still went ahead with the war planning of mass infantry assaults despite the likelihood of suffering significant casualties.
Answer:
C) Combination of activism and research
Explanation:
Please don't forget options to get the best answers. :)
A. Emphasis on technological remedies
B. Interconnected nature of our global village
C. Combination of activism and research
D. Emphasis on impending doom
E. Greatly expanded international communications
Activist research is a hybrid of academic inquiry and direct involvement in social and environmental action, as is the case with Transition in light of the aforementioned core ideals. So, research can be integrated into Transition's larger objectives.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
Was the supposed unfairness of the Treaty a significant contributor to the rise of the Nazi party in Germany--or was it merely a convenient rhetorical tool for German politicians to exploit?
I think that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles were unfavorable for Germany, although, this nation had to assume part of its responsibility for the damage and destruction caused during World War I.
Under the Treaty of Versailles, signed in Paris, France, at the end of World War I, the victorious allies forced Germany to pay for the repairments. It was a fortune. Germany also lost some territories.
Yes, the supposed unfairness of the Treaty was a significant contributor to the rise of the Nazi party in Germany. But let's be honest, the Weimer Republic was not successful to rebuild the country that suffered from poverty. The political conditions were set to the arrival of dictator Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party. He was the kind of leader Germany needed at that time. He found the perfect circumstances in Germany to flourish.
I also don’t know I want to know as well