1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Y_Kistochka [10]
3 years ago
12

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of

“tacit consent”. Rawls who is also a social contract theorist of sorts argues that a social contract can arise only from hypothetical consent. What is the difference between locke’s notion of tacit consent and rawls’s notion of hypothetical consent?
Social Studies
1 answer:
marissa [1.9K]3 years ago
5 0

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

You might be interested in
Which explains how African American civil rights leader Marcus Garvey might respond to this quote?
WINSTONCH [101]

Answer:

C. He would support the author for suggesting that racial equality is an impossibility.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Write a way to change bad person into good​
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

1. Recognize that This is Not Your Decision

Accept and honor the agency of the person you love. Ultimately, the decision to change rests in their hands, not yours. You can open the door, but you cannot force anyone to walk through it.

2. Accept Imperfections

Resist the urge to ignore or deny your loved one’s human frailties. You may not be able to condone specific choices that they’ve made, but you can learn to talk about those choices in a matter-of-fact way, as events that have happened.

If your loved one expresses the conviction that they are broken, damaged, or that something is otherwise wrong with them, don’t respond by insisting that everything is fine. Acknowledging that there is a problem creates the possibility that, someday, perhaps it can be fixed.

3. Modulate your Own Emotions

When we feel the expectations of others too keenly, they sometimes drown out our own impulses. A person on the crux of change requires enough emotional space to consider his options – without being weighed down by the shock, sorrow, and anger of the people who love him.

4. Listen

If your loved one’s choices are completely unintelligible to you — if the things she is doing seem to make no sense at all — then you are not yet properly equipped to help. Learn to understand your loved one’s perspective. Listen, ask questions, and refrain from interjecting your own opinions. You may not agree with their reasoning, but you must learn to understand it.

5. Change Yourself First

Relationships are like a teeter-totter. They settle into balanced states, with each person providing counterweight to the other. Imagine two children who have settled to equilibrium: they sit motionless in mid-air, perfectly balanced on opposite ends of the beam. If they wish to reach a new equilibrium, both children must move. If only one of them shifts position, the balance will be broken and one side of the teeter-totter will drop to the ground.

6. Be an Example

People tend to emulate the behaviors, attitudes, and life outlooks they see around them. Exemplify the lifestyle you hope your loved one will choose. Hold yourself to the same standards you expect her to fulfill. Become living proof that the path you believe in is possible.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a Region Clue cards?
il63 [147K]
It is from a hybridized mystery board game played in different geographic regions
3 0
3 years ago
Asch's conformity experimented showed that _____.
Stels [109]

Answer:

The correct answer is ''people were easily influenced to give the wrong answer.''

Explanation:

Solomon Asch (1951) was an American psychologist. The Asch experiment, was a famous experiment, designed to study conformity (degree to which the members of a social group will change their behavior, opinions and attitudes to fit with the opinions of the group), he wanted to study the influence of social pressure on people, the objective was to evaluate the responses of the individual under investigation, when the rest of the participants gave wrong answers on purpose. This was intended to allow Asch to determine how the individual's responses changed under the influence of peer pressure. The results of Asch's experiment were interesting showing that peer pressure can have a measurable influence on the answers given.

5 0
3 years ago
Please help!!! Science
Alex
C is the correct answer
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Functionalists are concerned with how mental processes help organisms ___ their environment.
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the passage a primary source
    12·1 answer
  • The Peru empire was ruled by what American natives
    12·1 answer
  • Subjects in an independent t-test who are members of one group can also be members of the other.
    15·1 answer
  • What is the milgram experiment? a naturalistic study that tested the goal theory hypothesis. a case study that showed people alw
    11·2 answers
  • Why are Senators not impeached for failing to exercise their Constitutional duty of reviewing President Obama's Supreme Court no
    5·1 answer
  • Which cabinet official is responsible for protecting our nation's borders both by land and by sea?​
    7·1 answer
  • What do the Southwest Asian countries of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, and Kuwait have in common?
    15·1 answer
  • True or False 3. Harry wanted to build a rocket to travel to Venus.
    9·1 answer
  • Which amendment gave black males the right to vote
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!