That sounds correct according to what I researched quickly
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>the hindsight bias </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In social psychology, </em><em>the hindsight bias is determined as the proclivity of a person to 'overestimate' his or her capability of predicting a particular outcome that couldn't be possibly predicted. In-short, a person claim of knowing something or predicting something that is not actually possible. The hindsight bias is also referred to as 'creeping determinism' or 'knew-it-all-along phenomenon'. </em>
<em>As per the given question, the given statement demonstrates the hindsight bias.</em>
I believe the answer is: <span>reticular activating system Theorists
</span><span>in biology , reticular activating system theorists believe that there are a small part of our brain that functioned as a filter that make us delete unecessary information from our memory.
If this reflected into social terms, this part of brain would help determine the type of behavior that people do based on the information that they have.</span>
Social Cognitive Theory is the view that individuals learn by watching others. In terms of Psychology, it clarifies identity as far as how a man contemplates and reacts to one's social condition. So we can say that it will only be effective if expect that this consequence will follow their good behavior.
