Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because "Tevye's analogy is supporting the idea of marrying only Jews; however, it does not explain
the reason why this is supposed to happen".
<h3>How Tevye's analogy is different</h3>
Tevye's analogy is faulty in this situation because it doesn't give reasons to why one is supposed to "seek his own kind".
It is good to seek one's own kind so as to avoid the cultural problem in marriage. It helps to solve the problem of origin differences.
Culture is very important in any relationship. In order not to have different perspectives on an issue, it is ideal to go into relationships with people of the same culture.
Learn more about analogy:
brainly.com/question/13978016
C. Support - 1. Contains examples and explanations that relate to the main ideas
b. Organization - 2. Uses paragraphs and has a beginning, middle and end
d. Convention - 4. Uses proper grammar, spelling and punctuation
a. Focus - 3. Addresses the assigned topic
~
The rhetorical appeal that the speaker used was pathos because he caters to readers’ emotions. That is option B.
<h3>What is rhetorical appeal?</h3>
Rhetorical appeal is defined as the method of persuasion that was formulated by Greek philosopher Aristotle.
It is made up of three modes which include:
Pathos is the rhetorical appeal that is concerned with the empathy and compassion shown towards another.
The rhetorical appeal that the speaker used was pathos because he caters to readers’ emotions.
Learn more about rhetorical appeal here:
brainly.com/question/8353123
#SPJ1
7 - 3 = 4
1*2/4*2 = 2/8
Now since we have a common denom, we can subtract.
7-2 = 5
5/8 + 4
4 5/8
Answer: 4 5/8