They believed it gave too much power to the national government.
Answer: B. Government leaders can learn about Texan's opinions
Government leaders must know about the opinions of its people therefore the people must make their voices audible enough. Some of the ways that can be done are becoming part of political campaigns and joining special interest groups.
Developing countries has a great influence on the non-western and developing countries, as the traditions and trends are mostly influenced by the developed counties.
<h3>How political, economic, and/or cultural approaches by European and other
Western countries shaped the developing world?</h3>
Political, cultural and economic approaches has shaped the non-western countries so much as they copy to develop countries like the way political parties run in the western countries or the western culture has largely contributed in developing countries.
The economy is also affected by the developed countries, as now developing counties also exported their home country goods to the other countries. some of the developed countries are U.K., Norway, Iceland, Switzerland, the United States.
Thus, Developing countries has a great influence on the non-western and developing countries.
For more details about Western countries shaped the developing world, click here:
brainly.com/question/10227244
#SPJ1
Answer:
Section IV contributes to a discussion of what may be the most important part of the Constitution—the unwritten principles that are the foundation of individual rights and free government.
Explanation:
Answer:
Article VII, the final article of the Constitution, required that before the Constitution could become law and a new government could form, the document had to be ratified by nine of the thirteen states. Eleven days after the delegates at the Philadelphia convention approved it, copies of the Constitution were sent to each of the states, which were to hold ratifying conventions to either accept or reject it.
Explanation:
This approach to ratification was an unusual one. Since the authority inherent in the Articles of Confederation and the Confederation Congress had rested on the consent of the states, changes to the nation’s government should also have been ratified by the state legislatures. Instead, by calling upon state legislatures to hold ratification conventions to approve the Constitution, the framers avoided asking the legislators to approve a document that would require them to give up a degree of their own power. The men attending the ratification conventions would be delegates elected by their neighbors to represent their interests. They were not being asked to relinquish their power; in fact, they were being asked to place limits upon the power of their state legislators, whom they may not have elected in the first place.
