The Congress failed to repeal the Affordable Care Act, enact immigration reform, or limit ownership of handguns because a lack of public consensus on each issue the public has been strongly divided.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is referred to as the Affordable Care Act or “ACA” which is for short, is the comprehensive health care reform law which was enacted in March 2010. Thus, this law has three primary goals which make the affordable health insurance available to more people.
However, the people would thus ideally, like to think that members of Congress are responding to the public opinion. Thus, the people who don't own guns think the opposite, they think guns are dangerous.
Hence, the Affordable Care Act was also known as the health care law.
To learn more about the Affordable Care Act here:
brainly.com/question/29398295
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:
</u>
An example of followers using a wider variety of influence tactics than the leader to modify attitudes and behaviors of others would be the arrangement of furniture in the office or the prominently displayed symbols.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The leader, being the one who has the supreme most dignity and the highest status of all, has a conduct of behavior and approach to follow all the time.
- But this is not true with the followers that follow the leader. They can modify their behavior and activities whichever way they want and influence others in order to benefit the leader.
Answer:
B). Danny.
Explanation:
As per the given description, Danny has the most probable chances of success as his therapist uses hypnosis(extremely focused concentration) that would help him to remain relaxed during the time of dental surgery as his entire concentration or focus would be devoted to a specific thing. Thus, he would not be able to experience pain while undergoing surgery and feel relaxed. Therefore, Danny has the most probable chances of being successful as the others are either using the method inappropriately or for an inappropriate cause('recall the night he was supposedly abducted by aliens'). Hence, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Answer: Need for river access
Explanation: A french lot system is a system that divides land into long narrow ridges that stretch back from rivers, roads or canals. examples in the United States are Louisiana and Texas.
