Well, if this is assuming there is no tax on the vehicle and it is fully paid off by the end of the payments, an equation can be set up like the following. 385x+1500=C, x being months and C being total cost. 385(12*4)+1500= C, 385(48)+1500=C, 18480+1500=C, 19980=C.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
C)3:2:6
Answer:
<h2>C. </h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>Hope it help </h2>
<h2>Studywell ❤️❤️❤️❤️</h2>
Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>
It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.
In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103
