In this situation, it would be a breach of contract if G<span>nome would require </span>Omkara<span> to pay a higher price than the agreed price. They have already contracted the price and they both agreed to it. </span>Omkara<span> can enforce her right to the contract claiming that she will only pay the $50000 because it is what they have agreed upon.</span>
Answer:
d.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the correct steps that are used by the FASB in developing GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) would be the following: issuing a discussion memorandum, issuing an exposure draft, and issuing a statement of principle. This collection of accounting rules was then adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Answer:
A. moral hazard
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this scenario is perfectly exemplifying the term known as a moral hazard. This refers to when an individual takes more risks because someone else is bearing the costs. Such as in this scenario, Christopher is an employee and should be working on company tasks but instead works on his own projects because the company cannot check up on him, which is morally wrong and he can get fired for it.
Bistro's first banner was a form of a unilateral contract. This means that the banner was a legally enforceable promise between two parties where one party will perform the requirement and the other (Bistro) would pay.
For the given situation, Daisy substantially performed the required task and therefore, Bistro is not allowed to revoke the offer.
Based on the above, the statement that <span>best describes Daisy's and Bistro's rights in this situation is:
</span><span>Bistro cannot revoke the offer because Daisy has substantially performed the requested action.</span>
