True because in Shanghai the equilibrium of the bees is much harder than the volume of the wasp in Kosovo
There will be no time to plan, demo, and improve together if there is no invention and planned iteration.
The Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration happens at the end of each Program Increment (PI) and fulfils several functions. It serves as a buffer for fulfilling PI Objectives and allocates time for innovation, continuous education, PI Planning, and Inspect and Adapt (I&A) activities. Every iteration is important, and the teams are largely focused on producing short-term benefit. The Solution gets closer to market with each iteration. The focus on solution delivery is high and unwavering.
Iteration Planning is a meeting when all team members decide how much of the Team Backlog they will deliver during the upcoming Iteration. The effort is summarized by team as a set of committed Iteration Goals.
As a result, if there is no innovation and planned iteration, there will be no time to plan, showcase, and improve together.
To know more about innovation and planning iteration click here:
brainly.com/question/26701667
#SPJ4
Answer:
it got a little hard to understand at the end but from what read, I'll say it's true...
Answer:
$1.67 Million
Explanation:
Current asset = 15 Million
Current liabiltiy = 15 Million/3
= 5 Million
Let the inventory X can be purchased with short term debt without violation
per current ratio requirement
(15 + x)/5+x = 2.5
15 + x = 12.5 + 2.5x
2.5 = 1.5x
x = $1.67 Million
Therefore, $1.67 Million inventory can Baker purchase without violating its debt agreement if their total current assets equal $15 million
Answer:
The correct answer is: soldiering.
Explanation:
American economist Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) in his book "<em>The principles of Scientific Management</em>" (1911) described the term soldiering to refer as the act by which individuals decrease the efficiency of their duties at work in purpose because of different adverse situations arose such as few wages incentives or the belief that by increasing productivity the less productive workers could be affected through lay-offs.
