1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reil [10]
2 years ago
6

Michael, a 25-year-old man, has committed serious felonies such as arson, assault, and battery. An analysis of his personality s

uggests that he has some inherent negative traits that make him extremely aggressive and violent. The trait theories state that criminal behavior is not the result of a person choosing to commit a crime, but rather that of the traits with which the person is born. If the trait theory is correct, what type of punishment does Michael deserve? What do you think are the implications for punishment for those who break the law? Provide reasoning for your answers.
Law
1 answer:
Andreyy892 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Although Michael broke the law from Negative Traits, Micheal is still responsible for his actions, he knows from right from wrong. Therfore charges should stand.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
At which stage in the pretrial process can the prosecution drop some of the charges against the defendant?
Nataly [62]

Answer:  Plea Bargain If a defendant is charged with multiple offenses, he or she can sometimes plead guilty to one of the offenses, and the prosecution will agree to drop the other charges.

Explanation:

i dont have one

7 0
3 years ago
Hello! Please click on the link and get me to 99% please!
matrenka [14]

Answer:

cool

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
An employer-employee relationship is created when
DENIUS [597]

Answer:

an employer has the right to control what work will be done and how that work will be done

Explanation:

Common Law Employee

5 0
3 years ago
1.- ¿Qué es la libertad?
Roman55 [17]
I’m going back to sleep in the next few days so I’m going back in a bit and get some sleep njjjjjjjj
3 0
2 years ago
How can the judiciary balance individual rights with the common good?
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

In simple words, In order to reconcile human rights with both the common interest, the courts must determine each circumstance on a scenario-by-case basis, bearing into consideration democratic values, existing statutes and previous Supreme Court and other tribunals decisions.

In America, our Constitution and other founding documents grant certain human freedoms or civil liberties. America's founders, including Thomas Jefferson as well as James Madison, intentionally placed these freedoms throughout the Bill of Rights because the government might consider it quite challenging to abrogate them.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Either you will eat or you will be picked up​
    7·1 answer
  • 3 Points<br> Which of the following is a right of employees in the United States?
    12·1 answer
  • What happens when children are born in prison and no one can take care of them
    6·2 answers
  • Another round of bullets hits my skin
    14·2 answers
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly
    7·1 answer
  • What is Plain View? Explain
    9·2 answers
  • What is Confrontation under the Sixth Amendment?
    12·1 answer
  • ¿El cumplimiento de mis derechos y deberes depende de m ? ¿Porqe?
    15·1 answer
  • Identify 4 areas of responsibility for the Department of Homeland Security. What was the reason it was created?
    10·1 answer
  • Which section of this diagram represents the highest court that has the power to rule that a law violates the U.S. Constitution?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!