Answer:
D: All of the above
Explanation:
Before a sport manager is liable for negligence, the plaintiff must show that the sport manager owed the plaintiff a duty of care. A legal duty of care arises from a relationship inherent in a particular situation, a voluntary assumption of the duty of care, and a duty mandated by a law.
The given is called a writ of attachment or an order of attachment
.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
In the court of law the defendant is an individual or company accused for committing a crime. If the judge has pronounced a judgement in favour of the plaintiff in the case of any disputes which may be a settlement in the form of money or in the form of assets.
The plaintiff may take the help of the court or court appointed sheriff to settle the dues from defendant. So the court appointed officials will make use of their power and protect the assets being sold. And this court process is known as order of attachment.
Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
Answer:
Yes i think this is right. Many successful criminal prosecutions in the United States end not with jury trials. Instead this gives a defendant a chance for a shorter sentence, especially if the defendant is not guilty. Agreeing to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors. These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to oversee.
Explanation:
<em>None Needed</em>
Answer: no it can’t be changed
Explanation:
