2 years ago

True or false?

Law

1 answer:

IRISSAK [1]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

This assertion is false

Explanation:

The freedom of self-incrimination protects the everybody irrespective of whether he's innocent or guilty by limiting the power of the government.

This means that nobody (including Paul) can be compelled to be a witness against himself or forced to say anything against his wish

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution establishes the privilege against self- incrimination. This prevents the government from forcing a person to testify against himself

Hence, Paul has the right against self-incrimination

You might be interested in

The President can make a short term agreement with another country that lasts for the duration of his presidency without any app

Olenka [21]

Answer:

executive agreement

Explanation:

sa tingin ko lang po

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

d. Do a research and briefly discuss the following processes that the community must engage in, whenever there is an issue befor

gulaghasi [49]

Answer:d

Explanation:

5 0

1 year ago

What are the three arguments concerning the Integration angle in Affirmative Action? (Name all three and explain)

snow_tiger [21]

Answer Integration angle just means peoples perspective on integration!

Explanation:

I had a little trouble reading this so I apologize if it's not correct!

Try rewording the question as: What are 3 arguments people make against integration when it comes to affirmative action?

I sadly do not know the 3 arguments regarding integration in affirmative action, but I hope the way I reworded the question helps! The term "integration angle" is rather confusing.

7 0

2 years ago

Drag the tiles to the boxes to form correct pairs.

AlladinOne [14]

Can i see a picture of the problem? i don’t see where to drag one thing to another

6 0

3 years ago

Please help will mark brainlest, I am confused with the whole question

Anvisha [2.4K]

A under no circumstances

3 0

2 years ago