1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sweet-ann [11.9K]
3 years ago
5

True or false?

Law
1 answer:
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

This assertion is false

Explanation:

The freedom of self-incrimination protects the everybody irrespective of whether he's innocent or guilty by limiting the power of the government.

This means that nobody (including Paul) can be compelled to be a witness against himself or forced to say anything against his wish

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution establishes the privilege against self- incrimination. This prevents the government from forcing a person to testify against himself

Hence, Paul has the right against self-incrimination

You might be interested in
Facts on karsales v wallis case​
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Mr. Wallis viewed a used Buick car that was being sold by Stinton for $600 . And the car was delivered not at the dealership but instead was towed at night to thee customer´s house and the next day Wallis found the car in bad condition the second day he inspected it

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between public forum and private property?
tiny-mole [99]
A public forum is something like streets parks and sidewalks which are; open to the public, it is protected under the first amendment, a private property is something that is owned by a private owner so basically anyone who isn’t the state or government
7 0
3 years ago
Que permitió que la idea de la propacion de la luz cambiara
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

La ley de refracción

Explanation:

La ley de refracción, o la ley de Snell, predice el ángulo en el que un rayo de luz se doblará o refractará, a medida que pase de un medio a otro.

5 0
3 years ago
Under common law, it is assumed a contract reflects promises that will be enforced without specifying the details in the contrac
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Ambiguity in contracts can be voided if subjected to more than one interpretation and may be dismissed as evidence if the court has determined the Contract falls under ambiguity.

5 0
2 years ago
Is it legal for the school to look at your private emails?
Allisa [31]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Unless the account belongs to the school, you can sue them.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Susan bought a home with a sale price of $235,000. She put down 20%, and obtained a loan for the balance. Her interest rate was
    14·1 answer
  • Choose the true statement about leaders?​
    12·1 answer
  • Distraction from the driving task can be caused by __________
    9·1 answer
  • Difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion
    9·1 answer
  • If your head was ie coconut why did the fish walk on ice. Giving poop for brains after the shower of death.
    13·2 answers
  • True or False: If you wanted to get a divorce, you would go to a criminal court
    5·2 answers
  • Should hate speech be regulated? (in a essay)
    9·1 answer
  • During the _____ Era, concerned citizens tried to reform society and make drug makers accountable to consumers.
    5·1 answer
  • Johnny loses his case in an Ohio trial court. He wishes to appeal his case decision. Which section of the diagram represents the
    6·1 answer
  • Who should you contact if you have trouble making payments.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!