Answer: Yes. The motel within its rights to refuse her admittance
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel but couldn't later travel and therefore called her sister, Ravinder, to make use of the motel room in her place.
We are further told that Ravinder was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it.
Based on the nice scenario, the motel was within its rights to refuse her admittance. It should be noted that the hotel room wasn't booked in her name but rather booked in Manpreet's name. The thing that Manpreet could have done is to inform the motel when she realize that she couldn't come and change the terms of the contract by saying her sister will be coming. But in this scenario, the motel is within its rights to refuse her admittance.
The claim that Australia was one of the first countries to give women the right to vote is untrue.
<h3>Who first granted women the right to vote?</h3>
The independent Grand Duchy of Finland, which later changed its name to the Republic of Finland, was the first nation in the world to grant the right to vote and the ability to run for office to all men and women in 1906. Additionally, Finland was the first nation in all of Europe to grant women the right to vote.
<h3>When were women first permitted to cast ballots in Australia?</h3>
The Constitutional Amendment (Adult Suffrage) Act was approved by the South Australian Parliament on December 18, 1894. A decade-long fight to get more women involved in politics led to the legislation.
To know more about right to vote visit;-
brainly.com/question/6826755
#SPJ4
Answer:
4
Explanation:
because he need something can be acceptable