Answer:
He will recover $70 because he was 30% responsible according to the court.
Explanation:
The Civil Procedure and Remedies Code on its section 33.001 states about proportionate responsibility. And it clearly states that in damages actions the claimant may not recover if it's more than 50% responsible. In the case given Macho is 30% responsible so he would recover 70% of the damages claimed that is the responsibility of the other part. Both parts have a certain degree of responsibility in the claim at the eyes of the court so, they compensate Macho´s claim of $100 according to the percentage the court gave to each one.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
D). No, because the man was acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
In the given situation, the man would not be considered guilty of murdering the woman and this is because the action took place when was defending himself from the attacks made by that woman on him. However, the man was attempting to steal the sweater at the store yet the deadly attack made by the woman on his head with the baseball bat cannot be justified in any case. <u>Her act would be categorized under 'dangerous felony' and therefore, the use of a knife by the man was enforced on him to save himself</u>. Hence, <u>the action was in 'self-defense' and he will not be punished for it as it was the woman who initiated the physical violence and harm</u> and he just reacted. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
the purpose is to get more money
Explanation:
Answer:
He spent three years as a prisoner of war
Explanation:
