Answer:
The futures price of the C$ should be 0.82/C$.
Explanation:
Let:
rUS = Risk-free rates in the United States = 5%
rC = Risk-free rates in Canada = 3%
S = Spot exchange rate = $0.80/C$
Since the rUS is greater than rC, we have:
Future price of C$ = S + ((rUS -rC) * S) = 0.80 + ((5% - 3%) * 0.80) = 0.80 + (2% * 0.80) = 0.80 + 0.016 = 0.816, or 0.82
Therefore, the futures price of the C$ should be 0.82/C$.
Answer: Yes they are
Explanation:
This is a Shrink-Wrap Agreement which means that in order to use a product, one has to accept the conditions that come with it. The term gets its name from the agreement printed on the shrink-wrap (plastic wrap) of a product. Tearing it off and using that product implies that you agree to the terms printed.
Bequator Corp., in buying the phones agreed with TracFone Wireless Inc's condition that the buyer will <em>"not to tamper with or alter the software"</em>. Bequator however went ahead and tampered with the phones they bought such that the phones could now be used on other networks.
This is a clear violation of the condition that TracFone sold it to them under which means that Bequator Corp. is quite liable for breach of contract.
Answer:
Companies that use ABC allocate all costs including direct materials, direct labour and manufacturing overhead to the product based on an activity cost allocation rate.
This statement is False.
Explanation:
In ABC, it is only the overhead that will be allocated to the product based on an activity cost allocation rate (cost drivers). Direct material cost and direct labour cost will be recorded at the actual cost incurred on direct material and direct labour.
Answer:
$6673
$14,533.50
$421,256.38
$234,243.36
Explanation:
The formula for determining future value is :
The formula for calculating future value:
FV = P (1 + r)^n
FV = Future value
P = Present value
R = interest rate
N = number of years
$1,800 x (1.14)^10 = $6673
$7,852 x (1.08)^8 = $14,533.50
$67,355 x (1.13)^15 = $421,256.38
$174,796 x (1.05)^6 = $234,243.36
C because some people can not afford to buy private goods which leads them to be excluding them from the products a firm makes