1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KIM [24]
3 years ago
9

(20pts) Prove that the product of any two odd numbers is always odd. Make sure to explain your proof​

Mathematics
2 answers:
koban [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Prove that the product of any two odd numbers is always odd.

Examples:

3 \cdot 7 = 21   \text{  }  \boxed{\text{odd}}\\5 \cdot 9 = 45  \text{  }  \boxed{\text{odd}}\\83 \cdot 3 = 249  \text{  }  \boxed{\text{odd}}

Defining an odd number as:

u= 2k+1, k \in \mathbb{Z}

u \cdot u = (2k+1)(2k+1)= 4k^2+4k+1

\text{Is } \boxed{4k^2+4k+1} \text{ odd?}

Yes, it is, because 4k^2 \text{ and } 4k \text{ will always be even considering } k \in \mathbb{Z}

An even number plus one is an odd number.

kozerog [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

See below (I hope this helps!)

Step-by-step explanation:

Because odd numbers are always 1 greater than even numbers, we can call the two odd numbers x + 1 and y + 1 where x and y are even integers. Multiplying the two gives us:

(x + 1) * (y + 1)

= x * y + x * 1 + 1 * y + 1 * 1

= xy + x + y + 1

We know that x * y will be even because x and y are also even and the sum of two even numbers will be even, and we also know that x and y are even and that 1 is odd. Since the sum of even and odd numbers is always odd, the product of any two numbers is always odd.

*NOTE: I put a limitation on x and y in my proof (the limitation was that x and y must be EVEN integers) but you don't have to do that, you could make the odd integers 2x + 1 and 2y + 1 where x and y could be any integer from the set Z like mirai123 did. I simply gave this proof because it was the first thing that came to mind. While mirai123's proof and mine are different, they are still both correct.

You might be interested in
Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
Ket [755]
Well, to cover the whole bridge, is 6/6, or 1 whole

so hmmm   \bf \begin{array}{ccllll}
concrete&bridge\\
\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash&\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\textendash\\
\frac{4}{5}&\frac{5}{6}\\\\
x&\frac{6}{6}
\end{array}\implies \cfrac{\frac{4}{5}}{x}=\cfrac{\frac{5}{6}}{\frac{6}{6}}\implies \cfrac{\frac{4}{5}}{\frac{x}{1}}=\cfrac{\frac{5}{6}}{\frac{6}{6}}

\bf \cfrac{4}{5}\cdot \cfrac{1}{x}=\cfrac{5}{6}\cdot \cfrac{6}{6}\implies \cfrac{4}{5x}=\cfrac{5}{6}\implies 4\cdot 6=5\cdot 5x\implies 24=25x
\\\\\\
\boxed{\cfrac{24}{25}}=x
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If 80% of scheduled flights actually take place and cancellations are independent events, what is the probability that 3 separat
Mekhanik [1.2K]

 

We are given that 80% of scheduled flights really take place, therefore this means that:

Probability of flying = 80% = 0.80

 

Now in statistics class, we know that the probability of two or more independent events to occur is simply equivalent to the product of their probabilities, or mathematically written as: (P = Probability)

total P = P1 * P2 * P3 *...

 

In this case, since we are to find for the probability that 3 independent flights will occur, therefore the total probability assuming equal probabilities to fly is:

total probability = 0.80 * 0.80* 0.80

total probability = 0.512

or

total probability = 51.20%

 

This means that there is only a 51.20% chance for 3 flights to occur.

7 0
3 years ago
Plz help its ez<br> What is the theme mean in reading.
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

what- what reading

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A car dealership sells SUVs and passenger cars . For a recent year, 80 more SUVs were sold than passenger cars. If a total of 51
MAVERICK [17]

Answer:

295 SUVs were sold, and 215 passenger vehicles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let s and p represent the number of SUVs and p the number of passenger cars.  

Then s = p + 80 and s + p = 510.

Substitute p + 80 for s in the second equation, obtaining:

p + 80 + p = 510, or:

2p = 430

Dividing both sides by 2 isolates p:  p = 215.

Since s = p + 80, we add 80 to 215 here, obtaining s = 295.

295 SUVs were sold, and 215 passenger vehicles.

3 0
3 years ago
Some students are trying to write an expression with fewer terms that is equivalent to 8 - 3(4 - 9x). Noah says, "I worked the p
Irina-Kira [14]

Answer: Yes I agree with Jada. His approach is correct.

Step-by-step explanation: The question requires the student to write an equivalent equation with fewer terms. Nonetheless, this does not prevent applying a mathematically correct approach.

(1) Noah is wrong and the reason is that the initial step is mathematically incorrect. The expression on the right hand side reads 3(4 - 9x), therefore starting with "8 - 3" is very wrong. The right step was to take one side which is 8 and take the other side which is 3(4 - 9x).

(2) Lin is wrong and the reason is that she started inside the parenthesis and this also is mathematically incorrect. The digits inside the parenthesis are "not like terms" and hence calculating 4 - 9x = -5x is very incorrect (the same way you cannot correctly calculate 500 metres minus 200 inches. You must make sure they are both in meters or in inches, that is both must be like terms).

(3) Jada is very correct in using the distributive property and ended up with the only correct solution. The digits on the right hand side of the expression  was solved first and that resulted in -12 + 27x. The reason being that the number outside the parenthesis which is -3, multiplied both digits inside the parenthesis. The minus sign had a major effect, and after simplifying the right hand side the expression now becomes;

8 - 12 + 27x

Since the like terms are 8 and 12, you can simplify further to become

- 4 + 27x OR the expression can be rearranged as 27x - 4

(4) Andre is not correct and the reason is that although he used the distributive property, he made a slight mistake while solving for the right side of the expression. What Andre did was

-3(4 - 9x)

-12 - 27x

Remember that when a negative value multiplies another negative value the answer is positive. Therefore -3 times -9x should have been +27x, just like Jada did as shown above.

From that point onward, his answer would be incorrect.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The rectangle shown below will undergo a single reflection through a line L. If the result of the reflection is a rectangle in t
    12·2 answers
  • Describe how to find 5-(-8) on a number line. If you found the difference using counters, would you get the same result? Explain
    10·1 answer
  • Trig work i don’t understand. pls help
    12·1 answer
  • Simplify the expression. (5+3)×4
    6·2 answers
  • What are rational numbers
    11·2 answers
  • How could you increase the mass of a wooden block?
    6·1 answer
  • Find the solution(s) to (x + 2)^2 = 49. Check all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • X-1=0 pls answer me I'll give u 10 points
    12·1 answer
  • Fish decrese 25% each year. If there are 60 fish in the lake last year, how many will there be this year?
    5·1 answer
  • As strange as it may seem, it is possible to give a precise-looking verbal definition of an integer that, in fact, is not a defi
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!