Answer:
true
Explanation:
Communication helps understanding people better removing misunderstanding and creating clarity of thoughts and expression.
Answer:
d. inventory is sold at a profit
Explanation:
Net working capital increases when <u>inventory is sold at a profit</u>
Net working capital = Current Assets - Current Liabilities
. Cash, Inventory and receivables are part of current assets
Hence, when inventory is sold at profit, cash received is more than decrease in inventory and hence, current asset increase and hence, working capital increases. When it is sold at cost, it remains the same. Purchase of inventory on credit will lead to same amount increase in current assets and current liabilities. Payment by customer will lead to increase in cash and decrease in accounts receivable, Hence, no impact
Answer:
Correct option is B.
The net benefit of the activity you would have chosen if you had not taken the course
Explanation:
Your opportunity cost of taking this course is <u>the net benefit of the activity you would have chosen if you had not taken the course
</u>
Opportunity cost is what you must sacrifice when you choose an activity. By taking this course, you are sacrificing the benefit you could have obtained from the activity you would have chosen if you had not taken the course.
Answer:
Provide a device through which the credit-creating activities of banks can be controlled
Explanation:
The legal reserve requirement is the minimum amount mandated by Central banks for banks to have as their minimum reserves.
The legal reserve requirement is used by the government as a means to control the supply of money in the economy.
If the central bank wants to reduce money supply, it increases the legal reserve requirement and if it wants to increase money supply, it reduces the legal reserve requirement.
A high reserve requirement reduces the amount that banks can make available for loans.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
