Answer:
$1 per pound
Explanation:
Marginal utility is defined as the additional satisfaction that a person gains from consumption of an additional unit of a product.
Since Robinson spends all of his money on mangoes and bananas his the marginal utility per price of each product will be equal.
This is called equi marginal utility (Gossens second law).
Marginal utility of mango ÷ price of mango = marginal utility of banana ÷ price of banana
30 ÷ 3 = 10 ÷ price of mango
10 = 10 ÷ price of mango
Cross multiply
Price of mango * 10 = 10
Price of mango = 10 ÷ 10 = $1 per pound
Answer:
a. $26,720
Explanation:
Before computing the accumulated depreciation, first we have to compute the original cost of the equipment, after that the depreciation expense. The calculation is shown below:
Original cos t = Equipment purchase cost + freight charges + installment charges
= $68,000 + $2,800 + $8,000
= $78,800
Now the depreciation expense under the straight-line method is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ estimated life in years
= ($78,800 - $12,000) ÷ 5 years
= $13,360
Now the accumulated depreciation is
= Depreciation expense × number of years
= $13,360 × 2 years
= $26,720
Answer:
A fire-breathing winged serpent adores crunching biscuits more than anything on earth, subsequently his name, the Muffin Dragon. An awesome anecdote about basic financial matters as it identifies with this mythical dragon and merciful yet poor people who live in a once-over mansion in the forested areas
Explanation:
Hope this Helps!
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
Answer:
b. judgment sampling.
Explanation:
In this scenario, where he believes that this group of students will be representative of the university student population in the United States, the professor is most likely using Judgment or Expert sampling which is normally used in circumstances where the pointed population involves very intelligent people like student of the University of United States here who cannot be determined by using any different type of probability or non-probability sampling method.
