The message being conveyed is that <em>A</em><em>. Literacy tests conflicted</em><em> with </em><em>America's ideals</em><em> of </em><em>liberty </em><em>because they were designed to keep immigrants out of the country. </em>
In the late 1800s, there were calls amongst some Americans to limit immigration because:
- unemployment was rising
- crops were failing
- there was land shortage
These people managed to get the government to implement literacy tests and immigrants who failed it would not be allowed in.
The cartoonist in this cartoon is criticizing it by putting the literacy tests as a wall which gives it a negative connotation because walls are generally used to denote progress being stopped.
We can therefore conclude that the illustrator here believes that literacy tests are negative and most probably conflict with American ideals such as liberty.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/12053389.</em>
Answer:
A family farm.
Explanation:
During World War II, the domestic scenario within the American territory was called "home front", where families and all those individuals who were not in the combat zone, both in Europe and in the Pacific, were morally obliged to contribute to the war effort, both through the labor effort in the production of armaments, supplies and food for the military in battle, as well as through the saving of own resources to generate surpluses that contribute with said resources destined to the armed forces.
Thus, family farms, which generated food for each family group, thus saving productive effort for it to be destined for the armed forces, were an essential part of the home front during the war.
Could you please provide some more details?
<span>Congressional staff increased greatly in the 20th century due to the shift in politics from grassroots to higher levels of lobbying, groups and special interests. The congress person was not only invested in their district but in those special interest groups requesting meetings and events with the congressperson. By increasing staff, they would be able to learn more about these groups and lobbyists so they could make a more informed decision. It also allowed the staff to deal directly with the public. A congressman in the early 20th century would only have in person visits and the occasional phone call, but by the end of the 20th century, the congressperson would have contact via appointment, call, letter, email and even rudimentary instant contact via Instant Messenger and sites like Myspace.</span>
