If elected to an executive position: would choose a fully technical team with ministers or secretaries who actually had expertise in their respective portfolios. People I had confidence in who could actually show results in different areas of government action. It would broaden the channels of popular participation, involve the population in government decisions. I would establish a management plan with goals to address the main issues of the place I was governing. And I would be very careful about the alliances I would make. I would not make alliances with the corrupt no matter what it cost. My biggest goal would be to finish the term with nothing to be ashamed of and very proud of.
Answer: there is more to the total product offer than the physical product.
Explanation:
The similarities between Greek and Roman government were that both favored aristocratic rule, both believed that their citizens should have a right to participate in politics and military service and they both governments were made up of several city states.
The differences were that the Greek government did not have political parties. If a Roman official was unwanted in office, the citizens would vote him off and just be glad that he wasn't governing them anymore, but if a Greek official was unwanted he'd be kicked off, ostracized, and banned from Athens for 10 years. Also, the Romans didn't allow women to vote, but women of upper class citizenship could influence their husband's vote.
Sorry, if the information isn't enough.
Answer:
which* and pardon but your question is not an actual question and has no answer to it. have a great day <3
