Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
0.5 / 100 * X = 3
X = 3 * 100 / 0.5 = 300 / 0.5 = 600
Answer:
|x − 10| = 0.15; x = 9.85 ounces
Step-by-step explanation:
its common math skills but yea.
Area=(Theta/2) * r^2 This should be it, obviously Theta is your angle and you should use radiants in theory.
Didn't answer all because I got lazy and I think you should try and do the rest yourself. Did this in 5 mins, try putting more effort into your homework. This is basic mathematics.