Answer:
11.2%
Explanation:
We need to calculate the weighted return of the portfolio. You have to multiply each stock's weight by the expected return.
- Stock X = 0.30 x 9% (expected return) = 2.7%
- Stock Y = 0.20 x 15% (expected return) = 3%
- Stock Z = 0.50 x 11% (expected return) = 5.5%
- weighted return of the portfolio = 2.7% + 3% + 5.5% = 11.2%
Answer:
after action review
Explanation:
After action review -
It refers to the complete brief analysis of any event which is completed , is referred to as after action review .
Complete analysis about the act is done in this process in order to get maximum information possible .
The process consists of steps like test , exercises , experiments etc.
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is after action review .
Hey there,
Answer:
It will decrease the government spending multiplier
Hope this helps :D
<em>~Top</em>
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
Coase theorem states that it is possible for private parties to solve the problems of externalities with involving a third party it is costless for them to bargain over resource allocation.
Given this description, we can now answer the question as follows:
a. What determines whether your roommate smokes in the room?
Based on the above, the smoker and non-smoker will bargain over whether it is possible for the smoker to continue smoking in the room based on the value of the choice of each party.
If the value placed on clean air by the nonsomker is greater than the value the smoker placed on smoking, the bargain will result in stopping smoking by the smoker. But if the value placed on smoking by the smoker is greater than the value the nonsmoker placed on clean air, the bargain will result in the smoker continue to smoke in the room.
b. Is this outcome efficient?
This outcome is efficient as the bargaining process is costless or as long as no transaction costs prohibit them from reaching an agreement.
c. How do you and your roommate reach this solution?
It is possible to reach this solution either by the non-smoker paying off the smoker to stop smoking, or the smoker paying off the non-smoking roommate to continue smoking.
The AICPA is required to adopt ethics standards that are at least as restrictive as the IESBA rules , The Last Statement describes how the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants' (IESBA) Code impacts the U.S. accounting profession
Explanation:
In February 2017, the AICPA Executive board on Professional Ethics decided to suggest changes to the system of professional conduct requiring certain measures when members are aware of non-compliance with legislation or regulations related to their involvement or employment.
IESBA also created a structure for accountants to follow the IESBA Professional Accountants ' Code of Ethics–in particular the problem of the tension between sharing non-compatibility with appropriate people and keeping client or contractor knowledge confidential— while hearing of unlawful acts under the new standard. The application of this code has been called NOCLAR. The recommendation from the AICPA is largely in line with the IESBA system, but significant differences do remain.
