How did the Maya civilization government and social classes impact their culture and daily lives?

History

1 answer:

Maslowich3 years ago

3 0

The Mayans were a very powerful region, and made important discoveries that influenced us now. However, they had some struggles against the natural environment, and their background history has failures and successes. The Maya was not a unified civilization, and it was made up of city-states ruled by an independent leader, the king. There were many kings in the Mayan time, but each king preferably ruled a different city-state. All the city-states followed the same culture, systems, etc., but they did not get along. Many city-states went to war with others, and destroyed each other. However, there was peace between all city-states at sometime, and the leaders often met each other to discuss important discussions.

Each city-state was advanced and well educated. The king was highly respected, and thought to be actually half god, half human, or, it was thought that the king was working for the gods. The people also had a strong belief that the king was chosen by the gods to rule, and was given permission. Not just the king ruled, also high officials were chosen among the nobles, (Lords, military leaders, priests, etc.) and also helped the king rule. Religion was very, very important in Mayan life, so priests were powerful figures in the government too, sometimes as powerful as the king. (The king was sometimes thought of as a priest.) Kings of Maya often came to priests for advice for what to do in a conflict, or for predictions of the future. Priests had a lot of influence on how the king ruled, and what the king did.

Mayan life was very strict and hard to follow. Many religious rituals were hosted everyday by the king, and it could last for more than 6 hours. Mayan laws were very strict, and had harsh punishments if the people committed crimes. Murder, arson, acts against the gods, (Acting against the gods had a very severe punishment, often death.) The punishment was reduced if the crime was found to be an accident, but still there was a punishment. If someone broke a law, they appeared in court and local leaders or nobles accompanied the judge in deciding the punishment. Sometimes, but rarely, the king was the judge. Usually, the king just sat and announced the person guilty or not. At the trial, the judge would get the evidence together, and also, witnesses would be there, and the judge would listen and talk to them. If the person was found guilty, then the punishment was announced and given right away.

There was no prisons in the Mayan times, so mostly the punishments were, death sentences, becoming a slave, and fines. Sometimes they would shave the person’s head when the crime was very small and was an accident, the shaved head represented the sign of shame. If the victim wanted to apologize and beg forgiveness, the punishment was reduced. The Mayan government was guessed to be an oligarchy, but it is not absolutely sure. There were 52 Mayan kings, and every single one of them has been powerful and treated like a god.

Bold ~ Main Part

I hope this helps! :D

You might be interested in

What impact did President Reagan's ideology that the Soviet's were evil have on the U.S./Soviet Relationship?

nlexa [21]

Answer:

President Ronald Reagan and Soviet Common Secretary Mikhail ... “In Reagan's see, Gorbachev was a communist, and might be ... “But they required to discover a way to overcome forty a long time of Cold War philosophy. ... a teacher of history emeritus specializing in U.S. outside relations at the College of Virginia.

Explanation:

Hope this helped

7 0

3 years ago

What sums up Herbert hoovers view on the great depression in 1933

Harman [31]

“We are at the end of our string. There is nothing more we can do.

7 0

3 years ago

Select one of the following adjectives and explain how it could be used to describe one of the Alamo’s defenders. Use details an

Anon25 [30]

Answer:

Brave

Explanation:

They fought long and hard although there were 10x the amount of attackers as there were defenders. They all stayed to defend it.

5 0

3 years ago

Which is an accurate statement about the fall of the Roman Empire and its effect on culture and civilization in Western Europe?

Fofino [41]

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice "The Goths established a new, centralized government that controlled all Roman territory."

The Sack of Rome occurred on August 24, 410. The city was attacked by theVisigoths<span> led by </span>King Alaric<span>. At that time, Rome was no longer the capital of the Western Roman Empire, having been replaced in that position by Ravenna in 402.</span>

I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How is Article 6

Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

ok so the first one is the supremacy clause (that's not all of article 6, it says more about states rights). it means that any laws on the national level trump the ones on the state level.

the second one is the 10th amendment, which says that states can do whatever isn't prohibited by the constitution (and other amendments), not just what is specifically said they can do.

this basically shows the power balance between the national government and states government. the national government is always supreme over state governments, but state governments still do stuff. that's what federalism is.

7 0

2 years ago