Answer: It is only the 3rd equation that is a good example to Jeremy's argument. Others are counter examples to Jeremy's argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us consider the general linear equation
Y = MX + C
On a coordinate plane, a line goes through points (0, negative 1) and (2, 0).
Slope = ( 0 - -1)/( 2- 0) = 1/2
When x = 0, Y = -1
Substitutes both into general linear equation
-1 = 1/2(0) + C
C = -1
The equations for the coordinate is therefore
Y = 1/2X - 1
Let's check the equations one after the other
y = negative one-half x minus 1
Y = -1/2X - 1
y = negative one-half x + 1
Y = -1/2X + 1
y = one-half x minus 1
Y = 1/2X - 1
y = one-half x + 1
Y = 1/2X + 1
It is only the 3rd equation that is a good example to Jeremy's argument. Others are counter examples to Jeremy's argument.
Answer:
105
Step-by-step explanation:
Theorem:
If parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then same-side interior angles are supplementary.
Lines AB and CD are parallel, and angles 3 and 6 are same-side interior angles, so by the theorem above, angles 3 and 6 are supplementary. That means that the sum of their measures is 180 deg.
m<3 + m<6 = 180
m<3 + 75 = 180
Subtract 75 from both sides.
m<3 = 105
Answer: 105 degrees
Answer:
The function is increasing for all real values of x where
x < –4.
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
This is a vertical parabola open downward (the leading coefficient is negative)
The vertex (h,k) represent a maximum
The roots of the function (or x-intercepts) are x=-6 and x=-2
The x-coordinate of the vertex is the midpoint of the roots
so
The y-coordinate of the vertex is
substitute the x-coordinate of the vertex in the quadratic equation
The vertex is the point (-4,4)
The function is increasing in the interval (-∞,-4)
The function is decreasing in the interval (-4,∞)