Answer:
The correct answer is B) a system that allowed the winning political party to give jobs to supporters
Explanation:
A spoils system is where a winning political party or candidate gives favor to their supports by giving them key positions or jobs in the government. For, generations this was common practice in the United States.
However, things began to change in the 19th Century as the people protested and asked more for transparency.
By the mid-20th Century, there was a clear difference between politics and civil service jobs.
However, many believe the practice still remains today. A recent example was Trump giving key White House positions to supports like Brietbart co-founder Steve Bannon.
In countries like India and Bangladesh, this is still common place.
Answer:
Soup Kitchens and Shantytowns
Answer:
The correct answer is C) The Nationalist Party and the Communist Party formerly were aligned.
Explanation: What was most surprising about the outbreak of the Chinese Civil War was that the Nationalist Party and the Communist Party formerly were aligned.
Both, the Chinese Civil War was that the Nationalist Party and the Communist Party formerly were aligned before the political divisions that generated the civil war. In 1911, when the Qing Dynasty ended, a void of political power affected China. That is when the parties formed, the nationalist Kuomintang Party and the Communist Party. Both parties were united for a time because originally, they wanted to unify China with support from Russia. But despite being united, internal differences and political rivalries made them take separate ways.
Please give me brainlyist.
The causes of the Great Depression<span> in the early 20th century are a matter of active debate among economists, and are part of the larger debate about economic crisis, although the common belief is that the </span>Great Depression <span>was triggered by the 1929 crash of the stock market.</span>
Of the list, the best answer is C) Automakers on the verge of collapse. GM, Chrysler and Ford (the Big 3 United States Automotive companies) were bailed out in 2009 following their request for a rescue bailout. This was controversial because, like other corporate bailouts that occurred at the time, the concept of "fairness" felt at best subjective and at worst disregarded. Some companies were rescued while others were not, and the American people did not have the privilege of an enormous bailout.
Some action was taken to insure sub-prime mortgages, and thus to help protect homeowners struggling following the housing crisis, but this was less controversial and also did not happen on such a large and immediate scale.