Answer: Umm... I'm not too sure if this is a news article, but I think this might be able to help... Its from AJPH and their article is called, "Positive and Negative Influences of Religion, Culture, and Tradition in Public Health". It was published in March of 2019. All rights and everything go to them. I hope this helps.
Answer: Religious tolerance implies respect for different religious beliefs.
Explanation:
Religious tolerance is considered a virtue. Religious tolerance celebrates diversity among people and encourages mutual respect, and enriches society. Religious tolerance celebrates democracy as democracy respects diversity and freedom. Society needs to be tolerant in this context because, in that way, harmony is created.
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
Answer:
I think to reduce the arms race, countries should stop worrying about what other countries are doing, and focus on the bigger problems going on within themselves. The arms race can be reduced or stopped by a treaty that both countries would have to agree on stopping and they would sign it. Countries should not be allowed to sell weapons and materials to make nuclear or biological weapons to other countries, because it is provoking the opposing country. Another nuclear war would have so many negative effects on people, animals, food and water supplies, businesses, and the Earth, and I think it would be very irresponsible to destroy our world just for a war.
Explanation:
