The answer is b. Civil court because it isn’t a criminal matter so they wouldn’t go to criminal court meaning it can’t be a they are neighbors not family members so they wouldn’t go to family court so it isn’t c and it isn’t d because in order to go to appeals court you have to have already gone to court and the prompt does not state that they are appealing the verdict of a previous court case
Answer:
that other answer better be right because I need to know the answer too :0
Explanation:
Answer:
Autonomous morality
Explanation:
Piaget suggests two types of moral thinking:
<u>Heterogeneous morality:</u> This morality occurs at the age of 5 to 9 years. This morality is imposed on the children from outside sources like their parents will impose morality on children. The children obey morality as the rules and regulations of others that can not b change.
<u>Autonomous morality:</u> This morality occurs between the age of 9 to 10. It is also called moral relativism. In this morality, children think about there no right or wrong and morality is based on intentions, not on consequences. Moral understanding under this age going for fundamental reorganization.
Answer:
The question above represents an example of a case.
Explanation:
The question above shows an example of a case. One case is a judicial process, where a situation of discrepancy has been established between two people, two entities, or between entities and people (as shown in the question above), where it will be necessary to review laws so that a judge can make decisions around this discrepancy, allowing the injured to be compensated.