The reason given by the author for presenting the false dilemma that people should either own a dog or no pet at all is option B.
<h3>An excerpt from Martin’s essay</h3>
The excerpt seeks to compare ownership of dogs and cats as pet animals. Dog owners are characterised with more maturity and knowledgeable that cat owners. Dogs are more reliant on their owners.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B; dogs are more reliant on their owners than other pets.
Learn more about excerpt:
brainly.com/question/21400963
Answer:
No you need to earn your Brainiest crowns.
Explanation:
I think teachers and or administrators should not be allowed to place restrictions on what students read, because after all we have a choice to decide what we want to read. In addition, of teachers/administrators want to avoid problems with your parents then they should have your parent/guardian write a note for you saying you can read it. Additionally, us students should choose what to read because some kids find for example violence or romance books interesting but some teachers won’t allow it, because they say it might be too extreme.
While this is true, it does not justify us not being able to choose our books. Teachers may think that if they let one student many other students may want to get violence, romance, horror books that may not be at there level which is why I think kids should choose there own book, with a signed note from there parents.
This is why I think kids should have a free choice of there books but if necessary or if a teacher/administrator thinks you may be immature then for the kid to bring in a signed note.
~Melany~ hope this helped! Thanks!
