1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uysha [10]
3 years ago
8

Why was West Germany excepted into NATO in 1955

History
2 answers:
BaLLatris [955]3 years ago
8 0
To counterbalance the Western European alliance. to convince East Germany to join NATO. to respond to Stalin's direct threat to attack West Germany. to prevent communism from spreading to West Germany.

I hope this helps.
zheka24 [161]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:to counterbalance the Western European alliance. to convince East Germany to join NATO. to respond to Stalin's direct threat to attack West Germany. to prevent communism from spreading to West Germany.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Part B I Picked (Ancient india)
pantera1 [17]
AND KAZOO JIT STOP PLAYIN WIMME
7 0
3 years ago
Why was the Berlin conference convened
Ad libitum [116K]
The Berlin conference was convened to divide the land of Africa among the European nations.
7 0
4 years ago
The group of people who actually elect a president is known as the electoral ? ​
olganol [36]

Answer:

They are known as the Electoral College

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
What was the Era of good feelings
Molodets [167]

Answer:

Answer is B.a time when there was little political strife

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the difference of views between the North and South on the Dred Scott<br> court case. *
Rasek [7]

Answer:

Dred Scott was an enslaved African American, and his court case for freedom raised hostility between the south and the North.

Explanation:

Dred Scott was born inside slavery, and from 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois, where slavery was forbidden. Upon coming to Missouri, Dred Scott appealed for his freedom from slavery, insisting that his residence in non-slavery territory gave him free. As the case reached the Supreme Court, the tension further increases between North and South. Since the 1820s, two parties had compromised on the issue of slavery's expansion (the Missouri Compromise). The North was not happy with the court decision as they believed the case gave Southern slaveholders growing power. The Southerners pleased as they believed the North had no right to interfere with matters related to slavery.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose for the American Colonization Society?
    12·1 answer
  • Why did congress call a convention to revise the articles of confederation
    12·2 answers
  • What were some of the negative effects of the laissez-faire government for employees? Consumers?
    13·1 answer
  • What can you tell me about the 5 empires in the America’s? Explain
    12·1 answer
  • How dose the government and economic power interacted between each other.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes why slaves were not taught to read?
    10·2 answers
  • Who took over, destroyed the city, and exiled the people of Judah to Babylon?
    13·2 answers
  • How did the expulsion of Jewish and Muslim people weaken the Spanish economy?
    11·2 answers
  • What did Prudence Crandall do for children in public education?
    15·1 answer
  • Approximately how long did the Minoan
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!