1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kicyunya [14]
3 years ago
6

Write a short paragraph comparing and contrasting the arguments that Roosevelt and Twain made about the occupation of the Philip

pines?
History
2 answers:
Xelga [282]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Sample Answer:

  • Roosevelt thinks occupation has brought liberty, while Twain thinks it has not.
  • Twain believes the people of the Philippines should rule themselves, and Roosevelt disagrees.
  • Twain thinks the United States conquered the Philippines, while Roosevelt says the United States helped the islanders.

Explanation:

i finished the assignment.

SOVA2 [1]3 years ago
4 0

Roosevelt thinks occupation has brought liberty, while Twain thinks it has not.

Twain believes the people of the Philippines should rule themselves, and Roosevelt disagrees.

Twain thinks the United States conquered the Philippines, while Roosevelt says the United States helped the islanders.

You might be interested in
Which of the following influenced the dawn of the Renaissance in Europe?
alukav5142 [94]
C the increased outside contact due to the crusades
8 0
3 years ago
How might supporters of the slave trade react to the ideas of the Enlightenment?
Nataliya [291]

Answer:

Enlightenment thinkers argued that liberty was a natural human right and that reason and scientific knowledge—not the state or the church—were responsible for human progress. But Enlightenment reason also provided a rationale for slavery, based on a hierarchy of races.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why was the 2008 presidential election significant?
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
Both the video transcript from Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety and the text Food Safety Myths Exposed present information in
Tems11 [23]

Explanation:

The correct answer is B) factual way.

Both the video transcript from "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety" and the text Food Safety Myths Exposed present information in a factual way.

"Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety" is an instructional video that teaches the importance of clean and healthy food. Indeed is a series of five videos about the science of our food supply. The topics that are factually covered by the videos are different kinds of bacteria, the Farms, processing and transportation of food, the food at retail and home, and outbreak and future technology.

hope that help mark me brinilylist

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were the different stages of society organized over time? Nomadic clans grew into civilizations when they learned to form pe
    13·2 answers
  • How did the diffusion of muslim ideas in medicine affect Europeans ?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the meaning of âhistory paintingâ in the theory of the french academy of painting and sculpture?
    12·1 answer
  • What types of german citizens were victims of the nazi party
    14·1 answer
  • Except for cases involving the President of the United States, the Supreme Court has the final say in all of the cases it hears.
    9·2 answers
  • What sparked the Russian revolution
    10·2 answers
  • Why did so many American Indians die as a result of European disease? A. Europeans targeted American Indian populations. B. Amer
    11·2 answers
  • 5.6 ft<br> 7 ft<br> 6 ft<br> 3.4 ft<br> 3 ft<br> 5.8 ft<br> 5.6 ft<br> UoysufzxigiTe
    11·1 answer
  • During which Civil War battle was Jackson
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following was not a change resulting from the French Revolution?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!